Telangana High Court
WP/24637/2004 of Durvasula Venkata Ramana, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, on 29 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 24637 of 2004 Between: Durvasula Venkata Ramana, S/o. Durvasula Chetty, R/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWRIT PETITION NO: 24637 of 2004
Between:
Durvasula Venkata Ramana, S/o. Durvasula Chetty, R/o. Charmarajula Temple Street, Old Pet, Chandragiri, Chittoor District.
AND
... PETITIONER
1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi Division, Tirupathi Town, Chittoor District. Chittoor District.
2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. Chittoor District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of 1st respondent in not disposing of the appeal dt.l01-08-2003 filed by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional andconsequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal dt. 01-08-2003forthwith.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.KRISHNA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court, at the admission stage, made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the first respondent in not disposingof the appeal dated 01-08-2003 filed by the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary anddirect the first respondent to dispose of the said appeal.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleaderfor Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents and with their consent, the writpetition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage.
3. As against the order dated 08-04-1999 passed by the second respondent –Mandal Revenue Officer cancelling and resuming the assignment made in favour ofthe petitioner in S.No.1518-1 and 1518-2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.20 centsand Ac.2.00 cents respectively in Chandragiri Village, Chandragiri Mandal,petitioner said to have filed an appeal before the first respondent – RevenueDivisional Officer on 01-08-2003, and the same is still pending on his file. Hence thepresent writ petition.
3. In view of the fact that the appeal dated 01-08-2003 filed by the petitioner ispending on the file of the first respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer, I deem itappropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction.
4. The first respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer is hereby directed to considerand dispose of the appeal said to have been filed by the petitioner, within threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at the admission stage.
_________________
N.V. RAMANA, J
MRR / SVV
// TRUE COPY //
Copy to:
1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi Division, Tirupathi Town, Chittoor District. Chittoor District.
2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. Chittoor District.
3 Two C.C. s to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
4 Two C.D. Copies.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER