Telangana High Court

WA/2176/2004 of Chandoori Muthaiah S/o Kistaiah Vs Government of A.P., rep by Secrtary, on 29 December 2004

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2176 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,

CHIEF JUSTICE

and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY

WRIT APPEAL NO : 2176 of 2004

(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated13/09/2004 in WPMP.NO.8768 OF 2004 AND WVMP.NOS.1707 AND 2634OF 2004 IN WP NO : 6748 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)

Between:

1 Chandoori Muthaiah S/o Kistaiah

R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 2 Chandoori nageswara Rao S/o Veeraiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 3 Chandoori Sudhakar S/o Veeraiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 4 Linga Mallamma W/o Ramulu R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 5 Tomu Nagaratnamma W/o Krishnaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 6 Kanakamedala Venkatarathnam W/o Satyanarayana R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 7 Chandoori Seetharamaiah S/o Pattaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 8 Chandoori Laxmaiah S/o Pattaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 9 Chandoori Laxmaiah S/o Pattaiah R/o Pallegudem (V) Khammam rural(M) Khammam District 10 Smt. M. Shakuntala W/o Sangaiah Kodad, Nalgonda district

..... APPELLANTS

AND

1 Government of A.P., rep by Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Khammam 3 Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Khammam Rural (M) Khammam district.

5 The Superintendent Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally,KhammamKhammam 6 The Executive Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally, Khammam 7 Telangana Fourth Class Employees Association, Khammam District, repby President Sri Kodi Lingaiahby President Sri Kodi Lingaiah

.....RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Appellants : MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITIONCounsel for the respondent No.7: Mrs. S. Nanda.

The Court made the following :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT:

( per Hon’ble The Chief Justice )

We see no grounds to interfere with the order passed by the learned singleJudge in allowing the vacate stay applications thereby modifying the interimorder of status quo. Rights of the appellants came to an end on assigning theland by the Government. In any case, on dismissal of W.P.Nos. 26336 of1995 and 15487 of 2003, appellants have no right to interject in the manner inwhich the land has been utilised by the respondents. Accordingly writ appealis dismissed. No costs.

____________________

DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J.,

______________________

M. NARAYANA REDDY. J.,

Dated: 29.12.2004.

VRK.

To

1 The Secretary to Government of A.P., Revenue Department, Secretariat,HyderabadHyderabad 2 The District Collector, Khammam 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Khammam Rural (M) Khammam district.

5 The Superintendent Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally,KhammamKhammam 6 The Executive Engineer, NSC, (Monitoring Division) Tekulapally, Khammam

7. Two CCs to G.P. for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT).

8. Two CD copies.

HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. NARAYANA REDDY.

W.A.NO. 2176 OF 2004.

( Judgment of the Bench delivered byHon’ble The Chief Justice )

Dt: 29.12.2004.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead