Telangana High Court
WP/18085/1999 of The A.P. State Cooperative Sccieties secretaries AND Vs The Govt. of A.P., on 29 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18085 of 1999 Between: The A.P. State Cooperative Sccieties secretaries &
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 18085 of 1999
Between:
The A.P. State Cooperative Sccieties secretaries & EmployeesUnion,E.G.Dist.rep.by Gr.secretary G.R.L.V.ChowdarS/o. Satyanarayana, East Godavari District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Govt. of A.P., Rep.by it's Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The Commissionr and Registrar of Coopertative Societies, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.
3 The District Collector,
Kakinada. E.G.Disrict.
4 The District Cooperative Officer,
Kakinada. E.G.District.
5 The General Manager,
Dist. Coopertative Central Bank, E.G.Dist, Kakinada.
6 The District Cooperatsive Officer,
Kakinada, E.G.District
7 The Divisional Coopertative Officer,
Kakinada. East Godavari District.
8 The Divisional Cooperative Officer,
Peddapuam, East Godavari District.
9 The Divisional cooperative Oficer,
Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
10 The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Amalapuram. East Godavari District. Amalapuram. East Godavari District.
11 E.G.Dist Primary agdri. Co-op societies employees Union Kakinada,rep.by it's general secretary RamaRao Ranuka Reddy, R11 isimpleadead as per count order dt.22.1.2000 in WP.MP.25707/99.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to appointcadre secretaries alone in all hte primary Agricultural cooperativesocieties in the E.G.District. by declaring the actionof the Respondents innot taking steps against such primary Agricultural Cooperative Societywho are engaging the services of some unauthorised individuals otherthan cadre secretaries by further declaring that the Cadere Secretariesare alone eligible to the appointed as Cheif executive of the Society asper the provisions of the A.P. Cooperatives Societies act and Rules madethere under and pass such other order or orders as it may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:G.RAMANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.SRINIVAS REDDY
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantial relief:
“for the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanyingthis Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order ordirection, more particularly one in the nature of Writof Mandamus directing the Respondents herein toappoint cadre secretaries alone in all the primaryAgricultural cooperative societies in the E.G. Districtby declaring the action of the respondents in nottaking steps against such primary AgriculturalCooperative Society who are engaging the servicesof some unauthorised individuals other than cadresecretaries by further declaring that the CadreSecretaries are alone eligible to the appointed asChief executive of the Society as per the provisionsof the A.P. Cooperatives Societies Act and Rulesmade thereunder.”
As there was no representation for the petitioner on 24-12-2008 and 26-12-2008, the writ petition has been posted fortoday under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, no one appeared for the petitioner at the hearing.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As asequel to the dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.22547 of1999 is also dismissed. No costs.
--------------------------------C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
29[th] December, 2008SKM