Telangana High Court
WP/25677/2003 of P.RAjshekar Vs The Superintending Engineer on 12 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: A.GOPAL REDDY W.P. No.25677 of 2003 Between: P.Rajasekhar. Petitioner AND 1. The Superintendent Engineer,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
WEDNESDAY THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTHREE: PRESENT :THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: A.GOPAL REDDY
Between:P.Rajasekhar.
W.P. No.25677 of 2003
Petitioner
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Superintendent Engineer, Buddha Purnima Project Authority, 1-8-323,Paigah Palace, Police Lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.Paigah Palace, Police Lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.
2. Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-323, Paigah Palace, PoliceLines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.Lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.
3. V.Saishivanand, S/o. Not known, R/o. Parameshwar Apartments, AnandNagar, Hyderabad.Nagar, Hyderabad.
Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writof Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 1 & 2 in not consideringthe representation dt. 17-11-2003 for extension of time for complying with thecondition of the tender and consequent allotment of the tender to Respondent No.3without notice and opportunity to the petitioner as illegal arbitrary, unfair, ultravires,violation of Art. 14, 19 & 21 of constitution of India, and consequently direct therespondent No.1 & 2 to give an opportunity to the petitioner to comply with the termsof tender.
The Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and affidavitfiled herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Amancharla V.Gopala Rao,Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr. B.Viswanatha Reddy, Advocate on behalf ofthe Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following ORDER:
shall
“ Post on 12-12-03 for admission. Pending further orders, the contract not be awarded to third respondent.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Superintendent Engineer, Buddha Purnima Project Authority, 1-8-323,Paigah Palace, Police Lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.Paigah Palace, Police Lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.
2. The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-323, Paigah Palace, PoliceLines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.Lines, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad.
3. V.Saishivanand, S/o. Not known, R/o. Parameshwar Apartments, AnandNagar, Hyderabad.Nagar, Hyderabad.
4. One CC to Mr. Amancharla V.Gopala Rao, Advocate(OPUC)
5. One spare copy.
SAH