Telangana High Court
CRP/5598/2015 of Sri Vasavi Arya Vyshya Nithya Anna Sathram Vs Soma Veerayya on 31 December 2015
SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5598 OF 2015 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the material on record. 2. The present Civil Revision Petition came to be filed under Article 227 of the
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMARCIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5598 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedcounsel for the respondents. Perused the material on record.
2. The present Civil Revision Petition came to be filed underArticle 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the Order, dated27.10.2015 in I.A.No.287 of 2013 in O.S.No.25 of 2006 on the fileof the Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Manthani, Karimnagar District,wherein an application filed under Section 94(e) read with 151 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure, 1907 (for short, ‘CPC’) seeking adirection to the respondents not to make any construction in thesuit schedule properties was dismissed.
3. Though various grounds are raised in the revision petition,learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his claim seeking adirection to the Court below to dispose of the original suit at theearliest.
4. A perusal of the material on record discloses that in CivilRevision Petition No.66 of 2007 this Court by its order, dated14.12.2010 directed the Court below to dispose of the suit within aperiod of six (06) months from the date of receipt of the copy ofthe said order. The record also discloses filing of I.A.No.287 of2013 by the petitioner, which was disposed of in the month ofOctober, 2015.
5. Having regard to the circumstances stated above and sinceno applications are pending before the trial Court, the trial Court is advised to dispose of the suit vide O.S.No.25 of 2006 at theearliest, preferably within a period of three (03) months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision petitionshall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Date:31.12.2015INL
_______________________
JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR