Telangana High Court

CC/221/2022 of A. Jayaprabhu Vs Amoy Kumar on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 221 OF 2022 Contempt case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for violating

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 221 OF 2022

Contempt case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts [Act ]to [Punish ][the]Respondents herein for violating disobeying the orders of the [High Court ][dated ][09-]11-2021 in W.P.No. 28118 of 2021.

Between:

A. Jayaprabhu, S/o late Sri. A firlanaiah, Age 45 Yrs, [Occ. ][Business, ][Ri/o]H.No. 1-1-781lC/2, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad- 500080

AND

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

Amoy Kumar, S/o Not known to the Petitioner, Age. Major, District [Collector,]Ranga Reddy District, O/o Collectorate, Lakdi-ka-Pool, Hyderabad [-4]

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K S SUNEEL

...CONTEMNORYRESPONDENT

Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

\

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHIS[HEK ][REDDY]

CONTEMPT CASE No.22l QF 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience [to ][the]order dated 09.11.2021. passed by this Court in [W.P. ][No.28 ][l18 ][of]2021.

2. Leamed Govemment Pleader for Revenue has [placed on record]the order dated 05.12.2022 passed by the Additionai [Collector,]Revenue (FAC), Ranga Reddy District vide caseNo.E2l47991202l.,inconrpliance with the order of this Court dated 09.11.2021.

3. Having regarri to the above, this contempt is closed [granting]liberty to tlre petitioner to challenge the order dated 05. [12.2022. ][No]order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, [pending]shall stand closed.

Sd/. CH. VENKATESWARLUDEPUW GREGISTRARSECTION [OFFICER]

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. One CC to [SRl. ][K S ][SUNEEL, Advocate [OPUC]]

2. Two CCs [to GP FOR REVENUE ][IOUTI]

[[CoPies]]"\y"\y

3. Two CD [[CoPies]]

VH

l

'

HIGH COURTAAR J,DATED: 3011212022

1le [Sl*\rg']3ORDERiI0 ? [t"tB ][?Uil]CC.No.221 ot 2022Ca. , Contempt Case is Closed.

o3

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead