Telangana High Court
WP/23621/2004 of G.Harinarayana Vs Chinnaram on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 23621 of 2004 Between: G.Harinarayana S/o.G.Seetha Ramarao R/o.3-5-780/11/ A ,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No: 23621 of 2004
Between:
G.Harinarayana S/o.G.Seetha Ramarao R/o.3-5-780/11/A, Super Apartments Kind Goti, Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Chinnaram S/o.L.Ram Chouwdary
R/o.Flat No. C 148 G.J.Nagar Neredmet X Road, Sainikpuri, R.R.District.
2 Station House Officer Kushaiguda Police Station, R.R. District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased topass an order or direction essentially in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing therespondent No.2, his officer, subordinates to him or superiors to him from interferingwith the peaceful life of the petitioner except in accordance with the law and passsuch other and further orders deems fit and proper in the circumstance of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.VEERABHADRA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR HOME
The Court at the admission stage made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner alleges that the respondents are interfering with his rights and subjecting him to harassment without there being any cases or complaints againsthim.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home.
The allegation of the petitioner is that even though no F.I.R. was registered and nocomplaint was received against him, the 2[nd] respondent viz., the Station HouseOfficer, Police Station, Kushaiguda, is sending constables for the petitioner andsubjecting him to harassment.
The circumstances, under which the petitioner was being sent for by the 2[nd]respondent, are not before this Court. However, for that matter, the petitioner cannotbe required to attend the police station, except in connection with investigation into aspecific complaint or where a case has already been registered against him.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the petitionershall not be called to police station or otherwise harassed, except with reference to adefinite complaint against him or where a case has already been registered. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
___________
27.12.2004
Note: Issue C.C. in three days.
(B/o)
Jsu
To
1 Chinnaram S/o.L.Ram Chouwdary
R/o.Flat No. C 148 G.J.Nagar Neredmet X Road, Sainikpuri, R.R.District.
2 The Station House Officer, Kushaiguda Police Station, R.R. District.
3 2 CCs to the G.P. for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT).
4 2 CD copies.