Telangana High Court
WP/24526/2004 of Smt. E. Aruna, Vs The Manager, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24526 of 2004 Between: Smt. E. Aruna, D/o. E. Geevaratnam, R/o. MIG-20, Phase-I,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 24526 of 2004
Between:
Smt. E. Aruna, D/o. E. Geevaratnam,
R/o. MIG-20, Phase-I, Pothireddypaly, X Roads, Mandal Sangareddy, MedakDistrict.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, Regd.Office H.No. 3-5-817, Bassheerbagh, Hyderabad-29. Regd.Office H.No. 3-5-817, Bassheerbagh, Hyderabad-29.
2 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, D.No. 8-129, Main Road, Sangareddy - 502 001.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OFMANDAMUS, direct the respondents to fill up the post of Full time Sweeperrespondents by the meritorious candidates who participated in the interview orselection process alone and consequently declare the action of the respondent inselecting the candidate who is not participated in the process of selection is illegal,arbitrary, and violation of principles of natural justice.
For the Petitioner: VADDEMANI SRINIVAS, Advocate For the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASAMURTHY, Advocate The Court at the stage of admission made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned counsel appearing forthe respondents and with their consent the writ petition itself is disposed of at thestage of admission.
The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to the order of this Court in W.P. No.13556of 2004, dated 03-08-2004, the respondents issued call letter dated 20-8-2004 to herto attend the interview to the post of Full Time Sweeper in their Company. Sheclaims to have topped the selection list. Her grievance is that the second respondentis going to issue appointment order to one Mr. Masood, who did not even attend theinterview, nor was he a candidate sponsored by the Employment Exchange forselection, which is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, the writ petition.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition merely on apprehension. The petitionerhaving attended the interview, without waiting for the results to be announced, hasfiled this writ petition contending that the respondents are proceeding to appoint aperson who has not even attended the interview, which cannot be entertained, andmore so when there is no cause of action for the petitioner to file the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission.
______________
Date: 29-12-2004
Svv
To
1 The Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, Regd.Office H.No. 3-5-817, Bassheerbagh, Hyderabad-29. Regd.Office H.No. 3-5-817, Bassheerbagh, Hyderabad-29.
2 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Companay Limited, D.No. 8-129, Main Road, Sangareddy - 502 001. D.No. 8-129, Main Road, Sangareddy - 502 001.
3 Two C.D.copies.