Telangana High Court
CC/1049/2005 of G. Rama Rao, Vs Sri. R.H.Khaza, Managing Director, on 28 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) FRIDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE : PRESENT: THE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: GODA RAGHURAM CONTEMPT CASE No. 1049 of 2005 Between: G. Rama Rao, S/o. Venkata Ratnam. .. Petitioner AND 1. Sri R.H. Khaza,
FRIDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE: PRESENT:THE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: GODA RAGHURAM
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1049 of 2005
Between:
G. Rama Rao, S/o. Venkata Ratnam.
.. Petitioner
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri R.H. Khaza, Managing Director, The Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam District.Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam District.
2. Sri K.J. Amarnath, General Manager, (Project), the SingareniColleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.Colleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.
.. Respondents
To
1. Sri R.H. Khaza, Managing Director, The Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam District.Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam District.
2. Sri K.J. Amarnath, General Manager, (Project), the SingareniColleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.Colleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.
WHEREAS the Petitionerherein has presented a petition to this courtunder Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiateappropriate contempt proceedings against the Respondents and punish themsuitable for deliberate and intentional violation of orders of this Hon`ble Courtpassed in WP. No. 12813 of 2004 dated: 23-07-2004; AND WHEREAS this court upon hearing the arguments of Mr. G.Vidya Sagar, Advocate for the petitioner while dispensing with the presenceof Respondent No. 1 anddirected issue of notice to the Respondent No. 2herein to show cause why, in the circumstances stated in the petition and theaffidavit filed in support thereof (copies of which are annexed hereto) heshould not be punished for contempt of court; Now: Therefore you namely ; Sri K.J. Amarnath, General Manager, (Project), the Singareni Colleries Co.Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.
BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause on or before 07-11-2005 towhich date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances stated inthe petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not bepunished for contempt of court ; Given under my hand and the seal of the High Court this Thursday the18[th] day of August, 2005
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
of petition and affidavit for service on the respondent 1 and return to thiscourt on or before 19-09-2005)
2. Sri K.J. Amarnath, General Manager, (Project), the Singareni ColleriesCo. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.Co. Ltd., Yellandu Area, Khammam District.
3. Sri R.H. Khaza, Managing Director, The Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd.,Kothagudem, Khammam District.Kothagudem, Khammam District.
4. Two spare copies.
Ksv
HIGH COURT
HACJ
&
KCBJ
Date: 18-08-2005
C.C. No. 1049 of 2005
Dispensing with the presence ofRespondent NO. 2