Telangana High Court
WP/37633/2021 of Bhavani Sankar Sastry Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2021
57 years, Occ Doctor, Villa No.28, Nakshtra villas, Shamshabad, Ranga ,..PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Home, Hyderabad. 2, The Director General of Police, Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad 4. The Station House Officer,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY. THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 37633 OF 2021
Between:
Dr. Bhavani Sankar Sastry, S/oA.R.L.N.Sharma, aged about 57 years, Occ Doctor,Shadan College, Medchal, RioVilla No.28, Nakshtra villas, Shamshabad, RangaReddy District.
,..PETITIONER
AND
1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Home, Hyderabad.
2, The Director General of Police, Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
4. The Station House Officer, R.G.l.A Police Station, Shamshabad.5. Rachamalla Ramaswamy, S/o. Pochaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ Business,Rl/o. Sidhanti, Shamshabad.5. Rachamalla Ramaswamy, S/o. Pochaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ Business,Rl/o. Sidhanti, Shamshabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or direction; more particularly one in the nature of writof Mandamus declaring the actions of the official Respondents in not following theguidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia in Arnesh Kumar Vs. Stateof Bihar and not issuing a notice U/Sec. 41-A Cr.P.C in respect of Crime No. 729 ofof Mandamus declaring the actions of the official Respondents in not following theguidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia in Arnesh Kumar Vs. Stateof Bihar and not issuing a notice U/Sec. 41-A Cr.P.C in respect of Crime No. 729 of2021 of R.G.l.A Airport Police Station, Shamshabad as illegal, arbitrary, unjust lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct theRespondent No.4 to strictly follow the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble SupremeCourt of lndia in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and consequently direct theRespondent No. 4 not to arrest the petitioner in Crime No. 729 of 2021 of R.G.l.AAirport Police Station, Shamshabad, pending disposal of the writ petition.affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct theRespondent No.4 to strictly follow the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble SupremeCourt of lndia in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and consequently direct theRespondent No. 4 not to arrest the petitioner in Crime No. 729 of 2021 of R.G.l.AAirport Police Station, Shamshabad, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.S.ANIRUDH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : AGP FOR HOME
--Counsel for the Respondent No.5 :
The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER
HO\oL ll. lll.l'l [sRI ][.lL s ][l'l(ll ][lt. ][\'l'l ][\\ sll\ ][l{l.l)l)\]
\\ RI'l' Pl:'l'l'l'lO\ [\o.-17(r]-13 [()1.' 2021]
ORDER [(ORAL ][:]
Heard Sri T.S. [Anirudh ][Reddy, ][learned ][counse ][I ][for ][the]and [le ][tmed Assistant Govemment ][Pleader ][for ][Home' ][and]petitioner, perused the matel [ial on record']
2. The pe itioner [herein ][is ][accused ][in ][Crinre ][No ][729 ][o1- ][202 ][I]registercdtbrti.:ol.fencesptrr-rislrahlctlnclct.seetitll-lsi06oi.theIncliln l)eual [(' ][,dc. ][l8(r0 ][f ]['lP(" ][) ][rrrrtl Scctiorr ][i(l)( ][r'r1 ][s) ][ol' ][thc]Schc.dLrlcd [caste ][: ][arrcl ][the ][Schecltrlccl ]['l rilrcs ][(l)r'e ][r c ][ltlott ][tll ][,\t:'ocities)],\ct. l9ii9 [(SC ].t [S ][I ][Act) ][oll ][rllc ][lllc ][Lrl ][rcsllotldett: ][\o ][-l ][- ][thc ][Strltiorl]HouseC)ft]cer,Rajir(]arlcihiltltt-rrlutitlttltll\irllor.t.Crllcr.ltblrtlDistlict.
3. The ler [rned counsel ][lor ][the ][pctitiorlel ][has ][subtltitted ][that ][the]petitioner is a [m:dical ][practitioner ][ar-rd ][he ][apprelrends ][that ][he rnay ][be]arrested by [resp'rndent ][No.4 without lollowing ][the ][guidelines ][issued]by the Hon'ble [I ][upreme ][Court in ][Arnesh ][Kumar ][v' ][State ][of ][Biharl]without issuing [rotice under ][Section ][41-A ][of ][the ][Code ][of ][Criminal]Procedure, [1973 ][(lbr ][short ]['Cr'P'C') ][and ][the ][procedure ][laid ][dou'n]lhere u [nde ][r,]
.1. l he issLre ilrr olr ctl [irt tlli: ][ri ][lit ]ll''titiorl [l5 ][l1() ][lll()re]
res intcgrcr. [lrl][ Konitlhitna ][,\ltlltttllt ][Sharrtta ][r ][' ][Statc ][ol ]['\ndhra]
Pradesh2, ir was clarified rhar rhe guidelines issued by the Hon,bleSuprenre Court in Arnesh Kumar's case (Supra 1) are applicableeven fbr the off-ences unde' the provisions of the scheduled castesand the Scheduled Tribes (prevenrion of Atrocities) Act, 19g9,provided that they are punishable with imprisonment of less thanseven years 'i [-rrc r.'a'.ct] c.u.seJ fb' rrre petitioner subr.nits that theof i'ercc IrLrrisirrhi,: Lrrrl. Sccrio. li l l(r.)(s ) o1- rhc SC & ST .,\ct ispLtrtisliablc n'itlt intIrisonr)tcnl ol'lcs,s lltan scr cn (7) I.e ars.
6. Therelbre. the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage ofadn.rission itself, directing respondent No.4 _ the Station HouseOfficer, Rajiv Gandhi Intemational Airport, Cyberabad District, tostrictly follow the procedure laid down in Section 41-A of cr.p.c. andaiso the guidelines issued by the Hon,ble Supreme Court in ArneshKumar's case (Supra l) while conducting investigation in CrimeNo.729 of 2021. No order as to costs.
As a seqr"rcl thereto, ntisceIlancous petitions, if- any, pending inthe writ petition stand closed.'(2017) 2 ALD (Crl ) 756
Sd/.K.VENKAIAHASSISTANT REGISTRA
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To1.The Principal Secretary for Home. State of Telangana, Hyderabad.2.The Director General of police, Telanqana. HvAeiairr.rJ.The Commissioner of police, Cyberab"ad4.The S^tation-Hols-e Officer, R.G:l.A police Station, Shamshabad.5.une uU to Sn Ls.Anirudh Reddy, Advocate IOPUCIb.fyq_9Cr [to ][GP ][for ][Home. ][High ][Court ][for ][the ]Sate o'f f"tangana at Hyderabadlourl7.Two CD Copies8.One Spare CopyKi ), I
HIGH COURTDATED:3011211021
HE [S ][i.q]14:a'J.--tI,JORDERWP.No.37633 >f 2021
DISPOSING C F THE [WRIT ][PETITION]WITHOUT CO STS.*3r\\v