Telangana High Court
WP/41043/2022 of Rathod Mohan Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO:41043 OF 2022 Between: Rathod Mohan, S/o. Late Ganapath, Aged about: 50 years, Occ:
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO:41043 OF 2022
Between:
Rathod Mohan, S/o. Late Ganapath, Aged about: 50 years, Occ: MandalSurveyor, Sarangapur Mandal,Rl/o. Brahmeshwar Village, MarlaggondaMandal, Adilabad District, TS.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad, T.S.Department, Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad, T.S.
2. The District Collector, Nirmal District.
3. The Assistant Director, S and LR, Nirmal District, TS.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nirmal Division, Nirmal Town and Mandal,Nirmal District, TS.Nirmal District, TS.
5. The Tahsildar, Sarngapur Sarangapur Mandal, Nirmal District, TS.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Afticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, on more in the nature of a WRIT OFCERTIORARI, or any appropriate Writ, calling for the records leading of the illegalimpugned Proceedings vide Procs No. Al /1025/2O22, daled. 1410912022 andquash the same, which was illegally passed by the 2nd respondent, andconsequently direct the 2nd Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in his duty inthe interest of [justice.]
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to staythe impugned Proceedings vide Procs No. A1/1025, 2022, dated. 1410912022, which was illegally passed by the 2nd respondent by directing to pay the fullallowance in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAKESH JANGEMCounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES ll The Court made the following: ORDER
\
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
SIRIT PETITION No.41O43 of 2O22
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letterd,ated, 26.12.2022 to trre Registry requesting to [post ]the matterunder the caption "for withdrawal".
2. In view of the letter submitted by the learned counsel forthe petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.There shall be no order as to costs.
3. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writpetition, shall also stand dismissed as withdrawn.SD/- N.SRIHARIASSISTANI REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//(ltSECTION OFFICER
To1. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES ll, High Court for the State of Telangana, atHyderabad. [OUT]2. One CC to SRI RAKESH JANGEM, Advocate [OpUC]3. Two CD CopiesPSK.SW-*- HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212022
ORDERWP.No.41043 of 2022
DISM!SSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
e*d*
rrr [sra]}(o2oL)23 [FtB ][?08].l:t)+\,-;.-