Telangana High Court
WP/23020/2020 of M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt ltd Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 23020 OF 2020 Between: M/s.
[ [32s5 ]I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 23020 OF 2020
Between:
M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., No. 2, Jeedimetla Road, Phase 1,IDA Jeedimetla, Chinthal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana 500055,Represented by its Authorized Signatory Madhavi Mudda, D/o. T RammohanRao, Aged about 50 years, R/o Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner, (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST)Hyderabad Rural Division.Hyderabad Rural Division.
2. Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad
3. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ ofmandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No.41041 dated 1410812019passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC OrderNo.2172 dated 25/1112020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void, illegal,violative of Article 265 and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia,totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the principles of natural [justice.]
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceelings and consequential actions pursuan to the assessmentorder A.O.No.4'1C41 dated 14lOBl2O19 passed by the Re:,ponded No. 2 andconsequently the rpugned ADC Order No.2172 dated 2511 i/2020 passed by theRespondent No. 1.
Counsel for the P )titioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAKCounsel for the R -'spondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY
The Court made t re following: ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE THD CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYAJ{ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.23O2O ot 2O2O
ORDER: Per the Hon'ble tl@ Chief Justice Ujjal Bhugan)
Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned counsel for therespondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuantto One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by theGovernment of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax disputewith the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw thewrit petition.
3. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed onwithdrawal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall standciosed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAOASSISTANJ REGISTRAR( -lsSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To
1. One CC to SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC][OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI K.RAJI REDDY, Advocate IOPUC]
3. Two CD Copies
PSK.BS;w
I
HIGH COU 1T
DATED:3011212022
ORDERWP.No.23020 of 2020
DISMISS!NG OF THE WRIT PETITIONON WITHD RAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.
&('ot1['L1,]
.4(: ci.,l:',-ij3 [1 ][JIN ][?0?3]2