Telangana High Court
WP/4389/1995 of Smt. Kavitha Deuskar, Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI WRIT PETITION NO : 4389 of 1995 Between: Smt. Kavitha Deuskar, W/o. Subash Patel, R/o. 3-6-361/ A /1,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARIWRIT PETITION NO : 4389 of 1995
Between:
Smt. Kavitha Deuskar, W/o. Subash Patel,R/o. 3-6-361/A/1, Deuskar Kuteer,Behind Lady Hidari Club, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1. The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Rep. Registrar,Mahaveer Marg, Hyderabad.2. The Govternment of A.P, Rep. Secretary.Education Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased todirect the respondents herein to take appropriate steps to implement the MeritPromotion Scheme of the University Grants Commission in the respondentUniversity for the category of Assistant Professor in painting by issuance of Writ,order of direction essentially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by holding that theaction of the Respondents in not implementing the Merit Promotion Scheme of theUniversity Grants Commission as illegal, irrational, illogical, arbitrary, discriminatoryand violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. J.SUDHEER
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr. C. Kodandaram Counsel for Respondent No.2: G.P. for Higher Education.
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
The writ petition is rendered infructuous. As can be seen from the submissions madeon behalf of the respondent University, the petitioner was promoted as AssociateProfessor in Painting vide Proceedings No.C3/3146/CAS/2000, dated 4-10-2000.The petitioner has been awarded selection grade scale under Career AdvancementScheme (CAS) with effect from 4-10-1996 vide Proceedings No.C1/860/CAS/2001,dated 21-1-2002.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as tocosts.
____________________________
(M.H.S.ANSARI, J.)
30[th] December 2004.
ARS
To
1. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Mahaveer Marg, Hyderabad.2. The Secretary to Government of A.P, Education Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad.
3. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Higher Education, High Court Buildings,Hyderabad (OUT).
4. Two CD copies.