Telangana High Court
WP/25281/2008 of T. Ramesh Vs The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, on 30 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 25281 of 2008 Between: T. Ramesh S/o. Subbarayudu D.No.7/13A, Park Street, Chennuru
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO : 25281 of 2008
Between:
T. Ramesh S/o. Subbarayudu
D.No.7/13A, Park Street, Chennuru Village & Mandal, KadapaDistrict.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Eluru, West GodavariDistrict.
2 The Director of Mines and Geology, Hyderabad.
3 The Joint Collector & Chairman, District Level Sand Committee, West Godavari District at Eluru.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtmay be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction mostlyone, which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action ofthe 1st respondent in refusing to issue dispatch permits to the petitioneras per Letter No.3657/Q/2007 dt. 14.11.2008 for transport of the sandquarried from Siddantham Sand Ramp, Penugonda Mandal, WestGodavari District as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional,unjustified and unsustainable and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VEERA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO.25281 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri P.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seekspermission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
_______________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
30.12.2008v v/ khm