Telangana High Court
WP/23365/2005 of K.P. Velayudham, Vs The A.P. State Finance Corporation, on 26 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 23365 of 2005 Between: K.P. Velayudham, S/o. K. Parasurama Mudiliar, D.No. 3-118,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAHWRIT PETITION NO : 23365 of 2005
Between:
K.P. Velayudham, S/o. K. Parasurama Mudiliar, D.No. 3-118, Murukambutt Village, Chittoor Mandal and District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The A.P. State Finance Corporation, Reptd., by its General Manager, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad. Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad.
2 The Branch Manager, A.P.S.F.C. Narasimha Thirtham Road, Balaji Colony, Tirupathi.
3 S. Harinadha Babu, S/o. S. Subrahmanyam, R/o. Rangaiah Naidu Buildings, Seshapiran Street, Chittoor.
4 N. Dhanalakshmi, W/o. Subrahmanyam,
Beside Indian Bank, Seshapiran Street, Chittoor.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to to Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondentsherein in calling tenders-cum-bid for sale of petitioner's house bearingD.No. 3-118, Murakamibut Village, Chittoor through tender Cum Bidnotice published in Vaartha Daily dated 18-10-2005 and consequentialDemand for eviction of the petitioner from the residential house bearingD.No. 3-118, Murakamibut Village, Chittoor on or before 31-10-2005 asillegal, arbitrary and violating Article 300A of Constitution of India andconsequently set- aside the impugned tender-cum-bid notice so far as itrelates to petitioner's house and pass such other or further ordersdeemed that are fit and proper under the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.BHATT
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.Y.V.RAVI PRASAD
The Court made the following:
Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAHWRIT PETITION No.23365 of 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
The learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, submits thatthough the petitioner filed the writ petition seeking declaration of theaction of the respondents in proceeding with the auction of hisproperties, he restricts his relief only to the extent of considering hisrepresentation dated 25.10.2008 filed before the respondents,requesting them to scale down the interest amount alone.
Having regard to the facts of the case, without going into themerits of the case and the main relief, the writ petition is disposed of,directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representationof the petitioner dated 25.10.2008, in accordance with law. No order asto costs.
___________________
V.ESWARAIAH,J
Dated: 26.12.2008Dsr
..... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To
1 The A.P. State Finance Corporation, Reptd., by its General Manager, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad. Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad.
2 The Branch Manager, A.P.S.F.C. Narasimha Thirtham Road, Balaji Colony, Tirupathi. Balaji Colony, Tirupathi.
3.2CCs to
4.2CD copies