Telangana High Court
WP/20041/2003 of SRI SHARAD PITTI , MOTI BHAVAN, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD Vs UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI AND 3 on 29 December 2017
SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.20041 of 2003 ORDER: On 30.11.2017, as the learned counsel for the petitioner was called absent both in the morning and afternoon sessions, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption, “For Dismissal”. On 8.12.2017 as well
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
On 30.11.2017, as the learned counsel for the petitioner was called absent both in the morning and afternoon sessions, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption, “For Dismissal”. On 8.12.2017 as well as on 15.12.2017, learned counsel for the petitioner requested for an adjournment. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption, “For Dismissal,” there is no representation for the petitioner both in the morning and afternoon sessions.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
Date:29.12.2017
______________
M. GANGA RAO,J
KPM