Telangana High Court
WP/40532/2014 of Pachva Srinivasulu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary, on 30 December 2014
R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.40532 of 2014 Date: 30-12-2014 Between Pachva Srinivasulu … Petitioner and The State of A.P., Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development, Secretariat Bldgs, Hyderabad; and 2 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
Writ Petition No.40532 of 2014
Date: 30-12-2014
Between
Pachva Srinivasulu
… Petitioner
and
The State of A.P.,Rep. by its Prl. Secretary,Dept. of Rural Development,Secretariat Bldgs, Hyderabad;and 2 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAOWrit Petition No.40532 of 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
Heard Sri M.Sudhir Kumar, learned counselappearing for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Murthy,learned Special Standing Counsel appearing for the 3[rd] respondent.
2. The petitioner is a Field Assistant under MahatmaGandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. He was suspended from service by proceedings dated 01-9-2014. It is submitted by the learned counselappearing for the petitioner that the suspension is notbased on any proper complaint and also not inaccordance with the procedure prescribed for initiatingdisciplinary proceedings against the Field Assistantsunder the Scheme. Therefore, the learned counselappearing for the petitioner seeks to suspend thesuspension order.
3. On the other hand, the learned Special Standing Counsel appearing for the 3[rd] respondent-Authoritysubmits that there are specific allegations against thepetitioner and since the order impugned is a suspensionorder pending enquiry, no interim order can be passed.
4. Considering the submissions made by both thelearned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to complete the enquiry within a period of onemonth from the date of receipt of a copy of this order andpass appropriate orders thereon as per the rulesgoverning the enquiry under the Scheme.
The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writpetition shall stand closed. No costs.
30[th] December, 2014.Ak
___________________
R.KANTHA RAO, J.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
Writ Petition No.40532 of 2014
30[th] December, 2014.(Ak)