Telangana High Court
WP/27799/2005 of M/s. Vasavi Medical AND General Stores, having its Vs The Superintendent, Government General on 28 December 2005
MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.27799 of 2005 28.12.2005 BETWEEN M/s Vasavi Medical & General Stores. …….PETITIONER AND The Superintendent, Govt. General Hospital, Guntur, Guntur District and others. …….RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Writ Petition No.27799 of 2005
28.12.2005
BETWEEN
M/s Vasavi Medical & General Stores.
…….PETITIONER
AND
The Superintendent, Govt. General Hospital, Guntur, Guntur Districtand others.
…….RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Writ Petition No.27799 of 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner challenges the action of the fourth respondent, DistrictCollector and Chairman, Government General Hospital DevelopmentSociety, Guntur in conducting negotiations on 17.12.2005 andleasing the right to establish medical shop in the first respondent-hospital in favour of the sixth respondent. The petitioner narratedvarious facts, commencing from issuance of tender notification, dated15.10.2005, till the award of contract in favour of the sixth respondent.It is alleged that the fourth respondent acted in arbitrary and illegalmanner in awarding contract to the sixth respondent.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Pleader for Medical and Health.
The issue relating to grant of lease for establishing a medical shop inthe first respondent-hospital was the subject matter of W.P.No.25045of 2005, which was filed by the sixth respondent herein. The sixthrespondent emerged as the highest tenderer. However, the contractwas awarded in favour of the petitioner by undertaking negotiations.This Court passed interim orders at various stages and ultimately,directed the fourth respondent to undertake negotiations with thepetitioner and the sixth respondent herein. On 17.12.2005 such anegotiation was undertaken and the sixth respondent offered Rs.17lakh, whereas the petitioner had walked out of the negotiations. Leftwith no alternative, the fourth respondent granted lease in favour of the sixth respondent. This Court took note of the said fact and closedthe writ petition.
In the affidavit filed in the support of this writ petition, the petitionercategorically stated that it refused to participate in the proceedingsconducted on 17.12.2005. The said proceedings were conducted inpursuance of the directions issued by this Court. If the petitioner haswalked out it, it cannot complain of any developments that havetaken place therein. In that view of the matter, this Court cannot grantany relief to the petitioner.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
VGB
_________________
28.12.2005