Telangana High Court
WP/33478/2010 of S. Thimmappa Vs The District Collector, on 30 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN WRIT PETITION No.33478 of 2010 Between: S.Thimmappa. … Petitioner And The District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
WRIT PETITION No.33478 of 2010
Between:
S.Thimmappa.
… Petitioner
And
The District Collector, Kurnool and others.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Gangisetty RajeswaraRao.
Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies.
This Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
-ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to setaside order dated 21-12-2010 of respondent No.3,whereby he has suspended the petitioner’s fair price shopauthorization.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitionerand the learned Assistant Government Pleader for CivilSupplies and having regard to the nature of theallegations contained in the impugned order, I am of theopinion that no relief, at this stage, can be granted as thepetitioner’s authorization has been suspended as aninterim measure, pending enquiry into the seriousallegations made against him concerning running of thefair price shop. The learned counsel for the petitioner,however, requested that respondent No.3 may bedirected to complete the enquiry at an early date.
Having regard to this request, the Wirt Petition isdisposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 tocomplete the enquiry and pass a final order after givingopportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a periodof one month from the date of receipt of the order.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMPNo.42454 of 2010 is disposed of as infructuous.
------------------------------------
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J
Date:30-12-2010Note:Issue CC in three days.(BO)
MNR