Telangana High Court

WP/33188/2022 of Nagula Nagaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

S/o N.Pochaiah, H.No.2-'1, Mandamarri, Mancherial. [ 3300 ] Aged about 40 years, Occ. Worker, HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION NO: 33188 OF 2022

Between:

Nagula Nagaiah, S/o N.Pochaiah,Aged about 40 years, Occ. Worker,H.No.2-'1, Mandamarri, Mancherial.

...PETITIONER

AND

1 Ihe Department, State_ (L of A), Secretariat, - Telangana, Rep, Hyderabad.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue 2The District Collector (L.A), IVlancherial District.

3The General Manager, SCCL Ltd, Ivlandamarri Area, Mancherial district.

4The DGIM ( E & M )Purchase, SCCL Ltd, Mandamarri Mancherial district.

5Sr. Estate Officer Mandamarri Area, SCCL Ltd, Mandamani lVlancherialdistrict.district.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or orders, more particularly one in thenature of writ of mandamus in not taking action on the application dated18.07.2022, and further it be declared that in not extending lease contract onTendar order no. [REDACTED] dated 01.10.2018 of petitioner vehicleNo.TS 19 T 5528 by respondent no. 3 to 5 is contrary to law being arbitraryunreasonable, illegal against the interest of petitioner depriving him of theirnatural right and needs their by infringing their right to equality under Article 14and right to life under Article 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to take action on application dated 18.O7.2022,and on Tendar order no. [REDACTED] dated 01.10.2018 of petitioner vehicle NoTS ['19 ]T 5528 to extend another 12 months lease pending disposal of the writpetition.

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

Between:

1 . The General Manager, SCCL Ltd, lVtandamari Area, fvlancherial district.

2. The DGM ( E & M ) Purchase, SCCL Ltd, l\4andamarri Mancherial district.

3. Sr. Estate Officer Mandamarri Area, SCCL Ltd, Mandamarri Mancherialdistrict.district.

..PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

AND

1NagulaNagaiah, S/o N.Pochaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Worker,H.No.2-1, [Mandamari, ]Mancherial-H.No.2-1, [Mandamari, ]Mancherial-

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by itsPrincipal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, (L A), Secretariat. Hyderabad.Department, (L A), Secretariat. Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector (L.A), [\ilancherial District

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

Petition under Section ['151 ]CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tovacate the interim order daled 2310812022 passed in l.A.No.l of 2022 in Wp33188 of 2022.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.POCHATAHCounsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITIONCounsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: SRt p.SRl HARSHA REDDy, SC FOR SCCL

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE [NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA]

WRIT PETITION No.33188OF 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for tlre respondents [submits that ][the ][cause ][in]

the Writ Petition does not survive [for ][further ][adjudication.]

2Recording the saic{ submission, [tl.re ][Writ ][Petition ][is ][dismissed]

as infrucfuous. No order [as ][to ][costs.]

Pending miscellaueous petitions, [if ][any, ][shall ][stand closed.]

SD/- V.KAVITHAASSISTANT (EGISTRARsecrro*6rncen //TRUE COPY//

To,1One CC to SRI D.POCHAIAH, Advocate [OPUC]1One CC to SRI D.POCHAIAH, Advocate [OPUC]

1One CC to SRI D.POCHAIAH, Advocate [OPUC]2One CC to SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC [FOR SCCL ][OPUC]2One CC to SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC [FOR SCCL ][OPUC]

JTwo CCs to GP FOR LAND [ACQUISITION, ][High Court ][for the ][State ][of]Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4Two CD Copies

BSR

GJ

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2911212023

ORDER

WP.No.33188 of 2022

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS

EsTArG(eJ>Zoo27[JAll]202to*["t-]t oEs PAT ck

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead