Telangana High Court

WP/16361/2007 of Vangala Somi Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Prl.Secretary on 24 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 16361 of 2007 24.12.2007 Between: Vangala Somi Reddy & others … Petitioners AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department, Hyderabad & others … Respondents

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

WRIT PETITION No. 16361 of 2007

24.12.2007

Between:

Vangala Somi Reddy & others

… Petitioners

AND

The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Principal Secretary,Irrigation & Command Area Development Department,Hyderabad & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondents : Government Pleader for Land Acquisition.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R:

This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:“ It is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleasedto issue an order or direction or writ especially writ of mandamus,directing the respondents to pay the determined compensationamount together with interest as per judgment & decree in O.P.No. 39 of 1996 dated 17.01.2001 on the file of Senior Civil Judge,Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District to the petitioners in respect oftheir acquired land by declaring the action of the respondents innot paying the determined compensation to the petitioners asarbitrary, illegal, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of theConstitution of India.”

Sri S.P. Tucker, Principal Secretary, Irrigation and CommandArea Development Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh is present before the Court. He stated that on 19.12.2007, thegovernment has issued G.O.Rt.No. 1421, where under approval wasgiven for payment of compensation to the petitioners and LOC wassanctioned on 22.12.2007.

Learned counsel for the petitioners says that in view of the same,the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thesame may be disposed of as infructuous. Ordered accordingly.

As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous,W.P.M.P.No. 20813 of 2007 filed by the petitioners for interim relief isalso disposed of as infructuous.

24.12.2007ksld

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead