Telangana High Court
WP/25196/2007 of M. Balraju S/o Komuraiah Vs The Superintendent of Police, on 24 December 2007
A . GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD W.P. Nos.25196 of 2007 Date: 24-12-2007 Between: M. Balraju .. Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar and two others .. Respondents ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A . Gopal Reddy) The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDYAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD
W.P. Nos.25196 of 2007
Date: 24-12-2007
Between:
M. Balraju .. Petitioner
And
The Superintendent of Police,
Karimnagar District, KarimnagarRespondents and two others ..
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy)
The petitioner, Balaraju, filed this writ petition seeking awrit of Habeas Corpus stating that he fell in love with one P.Jyothi, daughter of the 3[rd] respondent, and married her on 23-11-2007 at Saibaba temple, Nagaram village, East Gandhinagar,Keesara Mandal, Rangareddy District as per Hindu rites andcustoms and she is a major and her date of birth is 02-08-1986. He further stated that the 3[rd] respondent being the father of P.Jyothi on coming to know about the marriage, came along with hisassociates and forcibly took away his wife and since then she hasbeen illegally detained by the 3[rd] respondent.
Today, police have produced the 3[rd] respondent who filed acounter denying the said allegations and produced his daughter inthe Court.
On enquiry, P. Jyothi denied the factum of marriage by herwith the petitioner and her illegal detention by her father. Shefurther stated that she is prosecuting her studies and now she isstudying 3[rd] year B.Com.
In view of the above statement made by the alleged detenu,the contention of the petitioner that the said Jyothi has beenillegally detained cannot be accepted.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to establish his marriage with the said Jyothibefore competent civil Court and can avail the remedies availableto him in law.
__________________
A.GOPAL REDDY, J
_________________________
G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J
24[th] December, 2007Svv