Telangana High Court

CRLRC/201/2024 of Mirza Farooq Baig Vs Shabana Firdouse on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 201 0F 2024 Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.p.C to set aside the order

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 201 0F 2024

Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.p.C to set asidethe order d1j2-09-2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6212015 in M.C.No.15/20.15 on thefile of the Honorable Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum- Additional District andSessions Court., Nizamabad.the order d1j2-09-2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6212015 in M.C.No.15/20.15 on thefile of the Honorable Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum- Additional District andSessions Court., Nizamabad.

Between:

Mirza Farooq Baig, S/o Late Mirza Vazeer Baig, aged about 49 years, Occ. HomeGuard No.1 85 at Bodhan, R/o Police Quarter No.30, Bodhan Town, NizamabadDistrict.

... PETITIONERYRESPONDENT

AND

1. Shabana Firdouse, Wo Mirza Farooq Baig, Aged about 30 years, Occ.Household, R/o presently H.No.9-20-1507, Near Umar Masjld, Auto Nagar,Nizamabad.Household, R/o presently H.No.9-20-1507, Near Umar Masjld, Auto Nagar,Nizamabad.

...RespondenUPetitioner.

2. The State of Telangana, rep by P.P, Hyderabad, High Court at Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS/Respondents

l.A NO: 2 OF 2016(CRLRCMP. NO:27 31 0F 2016)

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased stay all fu(her proceedings in pursuance of order passed inCd.M.P. No.63/2015 in M.C.No.1512015, dt: 12-09-2015 on the file of the Court ofthe Hon'ble the Judge, Family Court-cum- Additional District and Sessions Court.,Nizamabad pending disposal of the Crl.R.C.

Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRl. VANAM VISHWANATHAMCounsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V.S.K.RAMA RAOCounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI VIZARATH ALl,Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V.S.K.RAMA RAOCounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI VIZARATH ALl, ASST. PUBLTC PROSECUTOR (TG)

The Court made the following ORDER:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPALCRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2OL OF 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397

and 407 of Cr.P.C seeking to set aside the order inCrI.M.P.No.63 of 2015 in M.C.No.15 of 2015, dated 12.09.2015passed by the Family Court-cum-Additional District andSessions Court at Nizamabad.

2. Heard the learned counsel lor the petitioner as well as thelearned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thecatrse in the present criminal revision case does not suwive foradjudication as the parties to this criminal revision case havesettled the issues outside the Court. Therefore, no furtherorders are required and hence seeks to dismiss the same asinfructuous

4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing forrespondent-State is present and takes no objection to the same.

0I

5. Taking on record the submissions made by the learnedcounsei for the petitioner and learned Assistant PublicProsecutor appearing for respondent-State, this criminalrevision case is dismissed as infirrctuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminalrevision case, shall stand closed sd/[- ]T. KRISHNA [KUMAR]DEPUTY REGIST

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The Judge, [Family Court-cum- ][Additional ][District and Sessions Court']NizamabadNizamabad

2. TwoCCstoPUBL|CPRoSEoUToR'HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to [SRI.VANAM ][VISHWANATHAM, Advocate ][[OPUC]]

4. One CC [to ][SRI.V ][S ][K ][RAMA ][RAO, ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]

5. Two CD [coPies.]

Cvk/kam

I

alql2YM

HIGH COURTDATED:2911212023

ORDER

CRLRC.N o.201 ot 2024

CRLRC is Dismissed as Infructuous.

I

1H€sr4r€16()oz(J1 I APR [2024]C;^{+tt DEsFATct{e9

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead