Telangana High Court
WP/16109/2011 of Sri Saraswathi Educational Association, Vs The Registrar of Societies / District Registrar on 28 December 2012
R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16109 of 2011 Dated: 28.12.2012 Between: Sri Saraswathi Educational Association, Kamalapuram, rep. by its President-cum-Correspondent. …..Petitioner And Registrar of Societies/District Registrar, Kadapa & another. …..Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.16109 of 2011
Dated: 28.12.2012
Between:
Sri Saraswathi Educational Association,Kamalapuram, rep. by its President-cum-Correspondent.
And
…..Petitioner
Registrar of Societies/District Registrar,Kadapa & another.
…..Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDYWRIT PETITION No.16109 of 2011ORDER:
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, questioningthe order of the Registrar of Societies/District Registrar,Y.S.R. Kadapa District.
Petitioner is registered under the A.P.SocietiesRegistration Act, 2001. As per Section 9 of the said Act,every year, the society shall, within 15 days from the dateon which the General Body meeting is held, has to furnisha list to the Registrar of Societies, which shall contain thenames and addresses of the members of the ManagingCommittee and the officers entrusted with themanagement of the affairs of the Society. In this case,such list was furnished by the petitioner on 21.04.2011,but subsequently, by impugned order dated 04.06.2011,passed in Proceedings No.G1/Sec/596/2011, theRegistrar of Societies/District Registrar, YSR KadapaDistrict, has deleted the said list from the records andordered to continue the body which was governing prior to21.04.2011. The said order is suspended by this Court by way of interim order, dated 14.06.2011, and it continuedall along.
In this case, it is to be noticed that during thependency of the writ petition, the year for which the listwas filed, itself, was expired. In view of the expiry of therelevant year, no further orders need be passed in this writpetition and it has become infructuous. However, if thereis any dispute with regard to the management, it is openfor the parties to approach the competent Court to workout the remedies. It is further made clear that if anydispute with regard to management is already pendingbefore any Court/forum, the same is to be decided withoutreference to any of the findings recorded in the impugnedorder.
Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
As a sequel, WPMP.No.19317 of 2011 andWVMP.No.3558 of 2012 stand closed.
__________________________
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
28[th] December 2012
ajr