Telangana High Court
WP(TR)/4020/2017 of R. KISHAN , KISHAN NAIK Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION (TR) NO.4020 OF 2017 Between: AND 1 R. Kishan @ Kishan Naiak, Son of R.Panthu,. aged- about 28 years, Worked as ffome
HIGH COURT [FOR ][THE STATE OF ][TELANGANA AT ][HYDERABAD]
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH [DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND [TWENTY ][ONE]
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [ABHINAND ][KUMAR SHAVILI]
WRIT PETITION[(TR) ][NO.4020][ OF 2017]
Between:
R. Kishan @ Kishan Naiak, [Son ][of ][R.Panthu,. ][aged- ][about ][28 ][years, Worked ][as]ffome CraiO (H.G.No.9179) [resident ][of ][H.No. ][3-51, ][Konavani ][Thanda, ][Post]nrngaprr, Ir,lanbhal 1\/andal, [hanga ][Reddy District, Telangana State. (Under orders]of removal)ffome CraiO (H.G.No.9179) [resident ][of ][H.No. ][3-51, ][Konavani ][Thanda, ][Post]nrngaprr, Ir,lanbhal 1\/andal, [hanga ][Reddy District, Telangana State. (Under orders]of removal)
.,,PETITIONER
AND
1The State of Telangana, rep.by its [Principal Secretary, ][Home ][Department,]secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 [022.]secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 [022.]2The Deputy lnspector General of Police, [Home ][Guards, Telangana ][state,]Yousufguda, Hyderabad. 500 045.Yousufguda, Hyderabad. 500 045.3The Commandant, Home Guards, Hyderabad City, [Hyderabad - ][500 002.]
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia [praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court [may be ][pleased]to call for the records relating to the impugned [proceedings ][in]D.O.No.95/201 4lNo.975lA2lHGs-Hyd/2014, dated 9.10.2014 on the [file ]of [the ][3rd]respondent herein and set aside the same to the extent of applicant herein as beingillegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of lndia andalso against the principles of natural [justice ]and consequently direct theRespondents herein to reinstate the applicant into services Home Guard with allconsequential benefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (SER.)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHtrVtU
W ITPETITION (TR) N o.4020ol 2 1't
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Whe I the motter is token up for heqring, leorned counselfor petitior er submits thot the issue roised in this w.it petilion issquorery c< vered by the Division Bench judgments of this courl infor petitior er submits thot the issue roised in this w.it petilion issquorery c< vered by the Division Bench judgments of this courl inW.P.No. l94i5 of 2014 ond botch doted 20.O4.2Oig ondW.P.No.778l of 2018 ond W.p.(TR).No.3129 of 2Ol7 doted28.02.2.019 r rnd contends thot ihe impugnerl remcvol order wos28.02.2.019 r rnd contends thot ihe impugnerl remcvol order wospossed witl'cut giving ony opportunity to the petitioner in termsof Rule 7(41 >t the Modros Home Guords Rules, [.194,i.]of Rule 7(41 >t the Modros Home Guords Rules, [.194,i.]
Leornr d counsel for petitioner further submits thol theDivision Benr:h of this Court in its orders in W.p.No.lg45S of 2Oi4ond bqtch doted 20.04.20.l8 directed the .lorespondents reinstote ihe petiiioners therein into service without ony benefitsin relotion tc their post service incruding seniority, continuiiy ofservice ond c ttendont benefi.ls.
Leorner I Government pleoder oppeorirg for therespondents I os not disputed the obove submission mo,Je by theleorned coun;el for petilioner oncJ contended thot the cose ofthe petitioner lould be considered for reinstotemenl into servicesubject to ph [,sicol ]fitness ond ovoilobility of posts withoul onybenefits in n rlotion to his post service including seniority,continuity of s< rvice ond ottendont benefits.
This Cour [r, ]hoving considered the rivql submissions, is of theconsidered vi< w thot the impugned order is possed without
giving ony [opportunity ][to the ][petitioner ][in ][terms ][of ][Rule ][7\4) ][oI]ihe Modros [Home ][Guords ][Rules' ][1949' ][Therefore' ][the ][order]impugned [is ][set ][oside ][ond the ][respondents ][ore ][directed ][to]reinstote [the ][petitioner ][into ][service ][os ][o ][fresh ][Home ][Guord]subject [to ][physicol ][fitness ][ond ][ovoilobility ][of ][posts ][wiihout ][ony]benefits [in ][relotion ][to ][his ][post ][service ][including ][seniority']continuity [of service ][ond ottendont ][benefits]
With the obove [observotions' ][ihe writ ][petiiion ][is disposed]of . No order [os ][to ][costs']
Pending [miscelloneous Peiilions'][ if ][ony, ][sholl ][stond ][closed']
T.KRISHNA [KUMAR]ASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]
r.lt)SECTION [OFFICER]
,TRUE [COPY//]
To,I '' The Princioal Secretary, [Home Department' State ][of ][Telangana' ][secretariat]AuitOings. [HYderabad-500 ][022']I '' The Princioal Secretary, [Home Department' State ][of ][Telangana' ][secretariat]AuitOings. [HYderabad-500 ][022']2. - The vorsrtgirod' Deputy HYderabad [lnspector. ][General ]500 045[of ][Police' ][Home Guards' ][Telangana ][state']3. The Commandant, [Home ][Guards' ][Hyderabad City' Hyderabad - ][500 ][002']3. The Commandant, [Home ][Guards' ][Hyderabad City' Hyderabad - ][500 ][002']
4. One CC [to Sri ][B. ][Krishna, Advocate ][[OPUC]]
5. Two CCs [to ][GP ][for ][Home ][(Ser')' ][High Court ][for ][the ][State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hyderabad. tOUTIHyderabad. tOUTI
6. Two [CD CoPies.]
7. One Spare [CoPY.]
IMPTR\\y
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212021
ORDERWP(TR).No.4020 [)t ][2017]
DtsPoslNG oF l HE WRIT [PETITION ][(TR)]WITHOUT COSTIiV
_".\.''' iJ:/-.,:L' ' ['.= ]/.Jr- [' ]t i;.l'.\1 I ii\ll [20r-2]