Telangana High Court
CC/1747/2015 of Poduri Linga Reddy, Vs Sri Anandha Mohan, on 31 December 2015
A . RAMALINGESWARA RAO Contempt Case No.1747 of 2015 Date: 31-12-2015 Between: Poduri Linga Reddy and 3 others .. Petitioners AND Sri Anandha Mohan and 3 others .. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A . RAMALINGESWARA RAO Contempt Case No.1747 of 2015 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAOContempt Case No.1747 of 2015Date: 31-12-2015
Between:
Poduri Linga Reddy and 3 others
.. Petitioners
AND
Sri Anandha Mohan and 3 others
.. Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAOContempt Case No.1747 of 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-implementation ofthe order dated 09-07-2015 passed in W.P.No.12911 of 2015. Therelevant portion of the direction reads as follows:
“……In the circumstances, respondents 4 to 6 shall jointlysurvey the land in the presence of the petitioners by issuingproper notice and verify the land in possession of thepetitioners and if it falls within the reserve forest area asclaimed by the respondents 4 and 5, they are at liberty to takeappropriate action under the provisions of the A.P. Forest Act. If it is found that it is outside the forest area, they shall notinterfere with the possession of the petitioners. The entireexercise shall be completed within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of the order and thepetitioners shall not be disturbed with their possession till then.If any standing crop is there, it is needless to mention that thepetitioners are entitled to cut the crop……”
A counter is filed by the respondents stating that pursuantto the order of this Court dated 09-07-2015, a joint inspection wasconducted by the Revenue as well as Forest officials along with the petitioners and an order was passed on 27-08-2015.
In view of the same, the contempt case is not maintainableand is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open to the petitionerto take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
Date: 31-12-2015
___________________________
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
Ksn