Telangana High Court
WP/27415/2006 of Dr.A.Jaganmohana Chari, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION Nos.14987, 15003, 15004, 15005, 15006, 15007, 15035, 15037, 15038, 15040, 15041, 15042, 15043, 15044, 15045, 15047, 15048, 27415, 27416 and 27421 of 2006 and 12203 of 2007 Dated: 28.12.2007 Between: Dr.E.V.S.Bhushanrao and others. .. Petitioners. And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT PETITION Nos.14987, 15003, 15004, 15005, 15006, 15007,15035, 15037, 15038, 15040, 15041, 15042, 15043, 15044, 15045,15047, 15048, 27415, 27416 and 27421 of 2006and 12203 of 2007
Dated: 28.12.2007
Between:
Dr.E.V.S.Bhushanrao and others. .. Petitioners.
And
State of Andhra Pradesh, Education Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT PETITION Nos.14987, 15003, 15004, 15005, 15006, 15007,15035, 15037, 15038, 15040, 15041, 15042, 15043, 15044, 15045,15047, 15048, 27415, 27416 and 27421 of 2006and 12203 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Learned counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issuethat arises for consideration in these Writ Petitions is squarely coveredby a Judgment rendered in Writ Petition No.5968 of 1990, dated22.07.2002, which was affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court inWrit Appeal No.1926 of 2002, dated 20.03.2003 and, therefore, thesewrit petitions may also be disposed of in terms of the said Judgment.
These Writ Petitions are, accordingly, allowed directing therespondents to determine the pension of the petitioners in accordancewith the A.P.Revised Pension Rules, 1980, and the respondents shallpass appropriate orders in this regard, treating the age ofsuperannuation of the petitioners as 60 years for the purpose ofdrawing pensionary benefits etc., within a period of two months fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.
28[th] December, 2007v vv v
____________________
JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU