Telangana High Court
WP/34390/2011 of Smt. Yenibera Kamalamma Vs The State of A.P. on 29 December 2011
GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 34390 OF 2011 Between: Smt. Yenibera Akamalamma W/o Kotaiah ………….PETITIONER AND The State of A.P. represented by its Director General of Police and two others
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMEDAND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 34390 OF 2011
Between:
Smt. Yenibera Akamalamma W/o Kotaiah
………….PETITIONER
AND
The State of A.P. represented by its Director General ofPolice and two others
………….Respondents
ORDER (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by thepetitioner, seeking a direction to direct the respondentsherein to release her son Yenibera Manoj Kumar @ MoshaKotaiah, aged about 33 years r/o ABM Palam, Markapurforthwith.
This Court by order dated 27.12.2011 passed thefollowing order:
“Post on 29.12.2011 to produce the detenu, if not already produced before any magistrate.”
We have perused the FIR and also Case Diarycontaining the remand report. The remand report clearlydiscloses that the son of the petitioner by name YenaberaManoj Kumar @ Moshe @ Moses S/o Kotaiah , 36 years,Hindu, Madiga, ABM Palem, Markapuram, is A-27 in FIR No.65 of 2011 and also A-3 in Crime No. 159 of 2011 ofMarkapuram Police Station, therefore, he was taken intocustody by informing his wife byname Phibesara on phone. It further discloses that the Station House Officer, attached toDSP, CID, Tirupati, Camp at Nellore requested the Magistrate to remand the accused to judicial custody for a period of 15days to enable him to complete the investigation.
In view of the above, no further orders need be passedin this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition isdismissed. We leave open all the contentions of the writpetitioner.
________________________
GHULAM MOHAMMED, J
_______________________________
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J
DATE: 29.12.2011KA
... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
To
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 2 CD copies.
SECTION OFFICER