Telangana High Court
WP/36953/2021 of Pittala Manjula Vs The T.S.S.P.D.C.L on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Between: Pittala lt4anjula, W/o Pittala Mahender, aged about 36 years Occ Labour, R/o Agapalli
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
wRlT PETITION NO: 36953 OF 2021
Between:
Pittala lt4anjula, W/o Pittala Mahender, aged about 36 years Occ Labour, R/oAgapalli village, Manchal mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1The T.S.S.P.D.C.L, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha,Khairatabad Rd, Near Eenadu Office, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, Telangana500004.Khairatabad Rd, Near Eenadu Office, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, Telangana500004.
The Divisional Engineer, TSSPDCL, lbrahimpatnam Division, lbrahimpatnam,R.R. District.R.R. District.
3. The Assistant Engineer, TSSPDCL, Yacharam, Manchal Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrictDistrict
4. Pittala Mahender, S/o P. Ramulu, aged about 37 years Occ Employee, R/oAgapalli village, fvlanchal mandal, Ranga Reddy District.Agapalli village, fvlanchal mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be [pleased]to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamusagainst the action of the 2nd respondent in not initiating disciplinary action againstthe 4th Respondent considering the representation made by the Petitioner dated08.09.2020 for his mrsconduct under Conduct Regulation clause XXI as the same isillegal, arbitrary and unjust consequently direct the respondents to initiatedisciplinary action against the 4th Respondent for the above said misconduct .
lA NO: 1 OF 202'l
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe Respondents to dispose/consider the representation dated 08.09.2020 made bythe petitioner pending the disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G RAVI MOHAN
Sx
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: R.VINOD REDDY, SC for TSSPDCL
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: ---
The Court made the following: ORDER.
\
W.P.No.36953 OF 2021
ABDE&
Learned :ounsel appearing for the petitioner seekspermission to \ dthdraw the writ petition with liberty to thepetitioner to file writ petition afresh.
Reserving srrch liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed asu,ithdrawn. No :osts.
Miscellan :olrs petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/.K.SREERA.MA MURTHYASSISTANT REGISTRAR( t'SECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY'
To,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. One CC to SRl. G tAVl MOHAN, Advocate [OPUC]2. One CC to SRI.R.\ INOD REDDY,SC for TSSPDCL IOPUC]3. Two CD Copies
4. One Spare Copy.
PBNPJq
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212C21
ORDERWP.No.36953 o12021
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COS] Soo-<^,,'K'Y
;f't=*l' o-T.,iJ03 [[?'i' ][2022].!'