Telangana High Court
WP/23659/2006 of Mrs. Symanthula Krishna Vs The Station House Officer, Gooty Police Station, on 26 December 2006
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTYSIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUNSAND AND SIX THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA And THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23659 OF 2006 Between: Mrs. Syamthula Krishna Petitioner AND The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OFANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTYSIXTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUNSAND AND SIX
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMAAnd
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO. 23659 OF 2006
Between:
Mrs. Syamthula Krishna
Petitioner
AND
The Station House Officer,
Gooty Police Station,Ananthapur, Ananthapur District and another Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Swaroop Reddy)
This writ petition is taken up based on a telegramreceived by the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, said to havebeen addressed by the petitioner herein, alleging that herhusband Symanthula Krishna s/o Neelurappa,Nachannapalli village, was illegally kidnapped by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Gooty; Mr. Lakshmi Narayana,Ramireddy Sarpanch and Mr. Vadugurappa, on07.11.2006.
In response to the notices issued by this court, theSub-Inspector of Police, Gooty, filed counter affidavit,wherein it is mentioned that there were some civil disputesbetween the alleged missing person, Krishna and someothers; a private complaint was also filed before thelearned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Gooty on15.11.2006 in that connection; the matter was referred tothe police for investigation and the investigation ispending. The alleged detenu was never illegally detainedby the police.
Letters from the Sarpanch, M.P.T.C. and PanchayatSecretary are also filed, which show that the allegeddetenue has committed a mischief with regard to the landof one Vadugoorappa by destroying the crop; a complaintis pending in that connection and apprehending that he might be arrested by the police, the alleged detenue isabsconding and he is now-and-then visiting the village.
In all these circumstances, particularly in view of theletters given by the Sarpanch, MPTC and the PanchayatSecretary informing that the alleged detenu is not illegallydetained by the police, nothing remains in the writ petition.
In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. Thereshall be no orders as to costs.
______________
D.S.R. Varma, J.
December 26, 2006MAS/BVS
________________
P.Swaroop Reddy, J