Telangana High Court
CRLP/8022/2019 of Vijaykumar Vemula Vs The state of Telangana on 31 December 2019
Cltllll\,\1. Pl,l'ITIO\ \0: 8022 OI.'2019 Be tn'ecn: Vijalkurr.rr \/enrula, S/o. Subrauranyam Petitioner/Accused No.2 AN I) 'l he statc of "['c'langana. Represented by station house officer, Thadvai police station, Mulugu Drstrict. through Public prosecutor. High court at Hyderabad.
IN THIi HIG[I COL;RT T'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT IIYDIiRABAT)
l UlrSDA\'. l'HI.: IHllt IY l-ll{S.l l)AY Ot l)ECt'-Mtst'.R '/]'WO I'IIOI.JSAND ANI) NINEI'IiEN: PI{ES[Nl':,I'IIE HON'tsLE JUSTICE G SRI DT]VI
Cltllll\,\1. Pl,l'ITIO\ \0: 8022 OI.'2019
I
Be tn'ecn:Vijalkurr.rr \/enrula, S/o. Subrauranyam Petitioner/Accused No.2
AN I)
'l he statc of"['c'langana. Represented by station house officer, Thadvai police station, MuluguDrstrict. through Public prosecutor. High court at Hyderabad.
Respondent/Complainant
l)elition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated inthc slrpport o1' the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant bail to thepetitioneri,^ccused No.2. arrested in Crime i,!o. 76 o{ 2019 of PS Thadvai, Mulugu District, onsuch terms ancl conditions as this I{onourable court may deem fit and proper in the interest ofj ustice Ihc pctition coming on lbl hearing. upon perusing the Petition filed in support thereofantl uporr lrt'irr ing thc argunrents ol' Sri K Venurradhav r\dr.'ocate lbr the Petitioner and ofAdditionri I'Lrblic Prosecutor lbr the Respondent. thc Court made the fbllou,ing.oltDEn:
I
f'
THE HON'BLE ]USTICE G,SRI DEVICRIMINAL PETITION No.8022 of 2019
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C., [is]filed by the [petitioner/accused ]No.2 seeking to enlarge him on bailin Crime No.76 of 2019 on the file of Thadvai Police Station, MuluguDistrlct, registered for the offence [punishable ]under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
Page 1 of 3
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 01.9.2019 at 3 [pm, ]atKatapur Cross road of SS Tadval Village, the complainant-Suresh,P.S.I., along rryith his staff and CRPF force conducted the vehiclechecking., and that accused Nos.1 and 2 were [proceeding ]fromKatapur Village, SS Tatapur Village side in a car-Toyrrta Itios blackcolour bearing No.AP-03 Tl t35) and on checking found 50 coversof ganja weighing about 100 kgs.
3. Heard learned counsel for the [petitioner, ]learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perusedthe record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner was arrested on 01.9.2019 and since then has been in jail;that the entire investigation is already completed and all the materialwitnesses have been examined; that though six persons have beenshown as accused Nos.1 to 6 in this case, the alleged recovery ofganja was shown from the present petitioner-accused No.2 andaccused No.1; that the name of the petitioner has been shown asaccused No.2 basing on his confession only; that nothing wasrecovered from the possession of the petitioner and false recovery \
'l'()
was shown; that the petitioner has not committed any offence.Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is ready toabide by any conditions imposed by this Court while granting himbail and he shall cooperate with the investigation into the case.Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is ready toabide by any conditions imposed by this Court while granting himbail and he shall cooperate with the investigation into the case.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that thepetitioner along with accused No.1 was found transporting ganjaweighing about 100 kgs, which is more than the commercialquantity and hence, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of bail.
Page 2 of 3
6. Looking into the nature of allegations levelled against thepetitioner, the facts and clrcumstances of the case, without delvinginto the merits of the case, I am inclined to release the petitloner onbail on his furnishing a [personal ]bond to the tune of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties to the llkeamount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First ClassMagistrate, Mulugu. The petitioner shall not tamper with theprosecution witnesses and shall co-operate with the investigatingagency and he shall not misuse the liberty granted to him. Thepetitioner shall not indulge in similar type of offences in future. Thepetitioner shall appear before the Court concerned on every date ofhearing.
7. Subject to the above, the Criminal Petition is allowed.
8. Miscellaneous [petitions, ]if any [pending ]in this criminal [petition,]
shall stand closed.
SD/- N. PT,RUSHOTHAM [REDDY]n-.;srsrnr'tr [RE ][G ][rsT ][RAR]t' ,4rN,{-SECTIOVOFFI{ER
,'tRUE COPY'
1. l-hc Se ssions .ludge for [NDPS ][Cases ][sum ][I Additional ][Sessions ][Judge, ][Warangal]
Se 2. l-hc ludicial Iirst [GhssA4agistrate, ][Mulugu][[.l-hc ]]
3. [[.l-hc ]]Superintendent, [Central Prison, ][Warangal]
4. Tlrc Srarion I [louse ]OfIlcer. ['l'hadvai Police ][Station, ][Mulugu District]
5. Irro C( [[ro ]]l)ublic [Prosecutot'. ][FIigh Coun, ][H-vderabad ][(OUT)]
[[ro ]](r. Onc C( to Sri K. Venu \4adhar'. Adrocatc [(OPt.C)](r. Onc C( to Sri K. Venu \4adhar'. Adrocatc [(OPt.C)]
7. [( ])n. -\Pi:tre cop\
Ht(;tI COt lt'r
(;s r).I
DATED:31/12l2019
OI{DEIT
CltLP.No.li022 of 20 l9
ctU.P. AI.t,o\\11t)
-43m
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…