Telangana High Court
WP/24293/2004 of N. Vasu Naik, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOs : 24293 and 24294 of 2004 W.P.No.24293 of 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NOs : 24293 and 24294 of 2004
W.P.No.24293 of 2004
Between
N. Vasu Naik, S/o Kotya Naik,O/o Dy. Transport Commissioner, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
rep. by its Principal Secretary,
T.R & B Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The Transport Commissioner,
Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Khairatabad, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue a writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofCertiorari , calling for the records pertaining to the order in O.A.No. 6535/2004dated 3-12-2004, passed by the Admn. Tribunal and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner forpromotion to the post of Motor Vehicles Inspector with all consequentialbenefits without reference to the pendency of Charge Memo No. 12009/XI/99dated 20-10-2000 as well as charge memo No. 5774/3/2003 dated 5-9-2003issued by the 2nd respondent herein and pass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.K.LAKSHMINARASIMHACounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT
W.P.No:24294 of 2004
Between:
V.V.Koteshwara Rao, S/o.V.Sudharshana Rao,O/o.Deputy Transport Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh
represented by its Principal Secretary T.R&B Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The Transport Commissioner Government
of Andhra Pradesh Khairatabad,
Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ ofCertiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the order in O.A.No.6533/2004dated 3.12.2004 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondentsto consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of MotorVehicles Inspector with all consequential benefits without reference to thependency of Charge Memo. No. 18619/XI/98 Dt.23.3.2000 issued by the 2ndrespondent and pass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.K.LAKSHMINARASIMHACounsel for the Respondents : GP FOR TRANSPORT
COMMON ORDER:(per Hon’ble GB,J)
These Writ Petitions are filed challenging the Orders passed by theAndhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.Nos. 6533 and 6535 of 2004dated 03-12-2004.
2. The matters relate to promotion to the posts of Motor Vehicle Inspectorsfrom the posts of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspectors.
3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that similaridentical O.A.s, one among them is O.A.No.5234 of 2004 and batch, arepending relating to the promotion for the years 2003-04 and 2004-05, whereas,these O.As. were dismissed at the admission stage. Therefore, the learnedcounsel would submit that atleast these O.As. shall be disposed of along withother connected matters to have a uniform decision over all the cases.
4. Inasmuch as, the similar identical cases are pending, we feel it appropriatethat these matters should be decided simultaneously so as to avoid conflict ofdecisions at the later point of time.
5. Under those circumstances, the Writ Petitions are allowed by setting asidethe impugned orders and the matters are remitted back to the Tribunal for freshconsideration. The Tribunal shall dispose of all the connected matters relatingto promotion from the posts of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspectors to the postsof Motor Vehicle Inspectors for the years 2003-04 and 2004-05 within a periodof six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Dated: 30-12-2004
Prv
_______________
G.BIKSHAPATHY, J
________________P.S.NARAYANA, J
To
1 The Principal Secretary,
The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
T.R&B Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The Transport Commissioner Government
of Andhra Pradesh Khairatabad, Hyderabad.
3. Two CCs to G.P. for Transport, A.P.High Court Buildings, Hyd.(OUT).
4. The Registrar, A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.
5. Two CD copies.