Telangana High Court
CRLP/15404/2013 of Kondani Anjaneyulu Vs State of AP., on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.15404 of 2013 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner-Accused No.3 under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail in Crime No.129 of 2013 of Kulkacherla Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, registered
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHARAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.15404 of 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner-Accused No.3under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Codeseeking bail in Crime No.129 of 2013 of Kulkacherla PoliceStation, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offencepunishable under Section 376-D of IPC and 3(2)(v) of theScheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention ofAtrocities) Act, 1989.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner– A3 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing therespondent-state.
3. It is alleged by the prosecution that A1 picked up thevictim on the motor cycle to drop her at her village. On the way,A2 and A3 followed her on some other two wheeler, thereafter A1stopped the motor bike near Gollakunta gate and all the threedragged her near a place to the Gollakunta gate, there A1 firstcommitted rape on her and later A2 committed rape on her. Whilethe third person was waiting for his turn, the victim raised cries, onhearing her cries, a person by name Ravi stopped his vehicle andat his intervention all the three sped away on their bikes.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thatthe petitioner did not commit rape on victim girl and he was onlywaiting outside for A1 and A2. Learned Additional PublicProsecutor submits that A3 is also the person, who dragged thevictim girl to the scene of offence and therefore, he is not entitledfor bail. He further submits that investigation in this case is at crucial stage.
5. In view of the above, I am not inclined to grant bail to thepetitioner at this stage. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
_________________
R. KANTHA RAO, J.
30[th] December 2013,Rns