Telangana High Court
WP/40264/2012 of Smt.Gangamma, Vs The District Collector, on 31 December 2012
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WP No. 40264 of 2012 Date : 31-12-2012 Between: Smt. Gangamma .. Petitioner And The District Collector, Anantapur and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri V. Sreemannarayana Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
WP No. 40264 of 2012
Date : 31-12-2012
Between:
Smt. Gangamma ..Petitioner
And
The District Collector,
Anantapur and others ..
Respondents
Counsel for petitioner : Sri V. SreemannarayanaCounsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader forRevenue The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantiverelief:
“ … to issue appropriate writ or order or directionmore particularly one in the nature of writ ofmandamus declaring the action of the 3[rd] respondentin not receiving and processing the document relatingto the sale of the agriculture land situated in Sy.No.1-2A an extent of Ac.1-70 cents of Cholemarri village,Roddam Mandal, Anantapur District and insisting toobtain No objection certificate from the Revenueauthorities is illegal, arbitrary and in violation ofprinciples of natural justice and in violation of Articles14 and 21 of the Constitution of India andconsequently direct the 3[rd] respondent to receive andprocess the document relating to the sale of theagriculture land situated in Sy.No.1-2A an extent ofAc.1-70 cents of Cholemarri village, Roddam Mandalof Anantapur District without insisting No objectioncertificate …””
At the hearing, Sri V. Sreemannarayana, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, sought for permission of the Courtto withdraw the Writ Petition.
Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, WPMP No.51097 of 2012 is disposed ofas infructuous.
________________________Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 31-12-2012
AM