Telangana High Court
WP/39956/2014 of K. Bala Bhaskar Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary on 30 December 2014
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.39956 of 2014 Date : 30-12-2014 Between : K. Bala Bhaskar Reddy .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies (CS-1) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
W.P.No.39956 of 2014
Date : 30-12-2014
Between :
K. Bala Bhaskar Reddy ..
Petitioner
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Represented by its Principal Secretary,
Food and Civil Supplies (CS-1) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ..
Respondents
Counsel for petitioner : Mr. G. Vijay Kumar Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader Civil Supplies The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of therespondents in not supplying the essential commodities tothe petitioner’s fair price shop as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, the learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Civil supplies has submitted that the petitionerwas appointed as a temporary dealer in the place of thepermanent dealer whose authorization was suspendedpending disciplinary enquiry. He has placed before thecourt the proceedings of respondent No.3 inRef.B.624/2004, dated 26-12-2014 and submitted that theauthorization of the permanent dealer of the fair price shopin question has been restored and stocks have beenreleased by imposing a fine of Rs.5000/-.
In view of the above noted submissions of the learnedAssistant Government Pleader, the cause in the Writ Petitiondoes not survive for adjudication and the same isaccordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a to thedismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.50101 of 2014 filedfor interim relief is dismissed as infructuous.
Date : 30-12-2014
AM
________________________
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy