Telangana High Court
WP/42680/2015 of O. Laxminarayana, Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited on 31 December 2015
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.42680 of 2015 DATED : 31.12.2015 Between: O.Laxminarayana S/o.Late Shri O.Ilaiah, Aged 56 yrs, E.C.No.0267644, Trammer, VK-7, Incline, Kothagudem, The Singareni Colliaries Company Limited, R/o.Qr.No.D-205, Market Area, Rudrampur, Kothagudem, Khammam
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.42680 of 2015
DATED : 31.12.2015
Between:
O.Laxminarayana S/o.Late Shri O.Ilaiah,Aged 56 yrs, E.C.No.0267644,Trammer, VK-7, Incline, Kothagudem,The Singareni Colliaries Company Limited,R/o.Qr.No.D-205, Market Area, Rudrampur,Kothagudem, Khammam District.
.. Petitioner
AND
The Singareni Collieries Company Limited,Rep., by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director,Singareni Bhavan,Red Hills, Hyderabad & another. .. Respondents The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.42680 of 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner herein joined service in the 1[st] respondentcompany as Badili Filler in the year 1982. At the time of entry intoservice, the date of birth of the petitioner was recorded as 08-12-1956. The petitioner claims that he studied up to IV th classduring the academic year 1971 at C.U.P. School, Ananda Khani,M.P.P., Kothagudem, Khammam District and his date of birth wasrecorded as 10.01.1959. Thus according to the date of birth, asper the school record, he has to be continued in service till 2017and erroneously, he is being retired from service even beforeattaining the age of superannuation.
2. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for thepetitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondentshave stated that the petitioner can be referred to apex MedicalBoard for examination of his age according to the directions issuedby this Court in W.P.No.33343 of 2012 and batch, dated31.03.2015.
3. Having regard to the submission made, the writpetition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits, directing the respondent company to subject the petitioner formedical examination in accordance with the directions issued bythis Court in W.P.No.33343 of 2012 and batch, dated 31.03.2015,and take appropriate further course of action regarding the date ofbirth entered in the service record and the date of retirement of thepetitioner. The exercise of subjecting the petitioner to medicalexamination and the consequential decision shall be taken within aperiod of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 31[st] December, 2015Rds