Telangana High Court
WP/27605/2005 of Smt. Nazeneen, Vs The Station House Officer, L.B. Nagar P.S., on 28 December 2005
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTYEIGTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 27605 of 2005 Between: Smt.Nazeneen w/o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTYEIGTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
&
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 27605 of 2005
Between:
Smt.Nazeneen w/o late Imdad Ali
AND
..... PETITIONER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Station House Officer, L.B.Nagar P.S. & another.
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER: (Per the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari)
This is a taken up case on the Telegram issued by the petitioner seekinga direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents toproduce the grand son of the petitioner viz., Hussaini s/o Hamanyunali, aged 22years, OCC: Spectable business, before this Court on the ground that he wasillegally taken away by the L.B. Nagar Police, Ranga Reddy District on14.12.2005.
The respondents have filed the counter denying the allegations in theTelegram. It is stated in the counter that on the report given by one MetlakuntaSrinivas, resident of Suraram colony, Jeedimetla alleged theft in the house, thealleged detenue was taken into custody on 22.12.2005 by the Jeedimetla Policestation in connection with Crime No:803 of 2005 for the offence under sections457 and 380 I.P.C. He was produced before the learned VII MetropolitanMagistrate at Medchal, Cyberabad on 23.12.2005 and remanded to judicialcustody.
It is submitted across the Bar by the learned Advocate General that inview of involvement of the alleged detenue in Cr.No:803 of 2005 for the offenceunder sections 457 and 380 I.P.C. of Jeedimetla Police station, the question ofillegal detention does not arise and therefore, there are no merits in this writpetition.
In view of the submission made by the learned Additional AdvocateGeneral and in view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, We are ofthe view that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition andaccordingly, the same is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
28[th] December, 2005
GURC
(T.MEENAKUMARI, J)
(K.C.BHANU, J)
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI&THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 27606 of 2005
(Order delivered by the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meena Kumari)
28th December, 2005.