Telangana High Court
CRLP/9285/2012 of Ambati Suneel Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.9285 of 2012 ORDER:- The petitioner is accused in COR No.616/2012-13 of Prohibition & Excise Station, Armoor, registered for the offence under Section 8(c) read with 22 (c) of the NDPS Act. This is second bail application. The earlier
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDYCriminal Petition No.9285 of 2012
ORDER:-
The petitioner is accused in COR No.616/2012-13 of Prohibition& Excise Station, Armoor, registered for the offence under Section 8(c)read with 22 (c) of the NDPS Act.
This is second bail application. The earlier bail application cameto be dismissed on 27-11-2012 vide Criminal Petition No.8071 of2012.
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.It is contended by the learned Counsel appearing for thepetitioner that the petitioner is suffering from serious ailment and herequires specialized treatment and therefore he deserves for grant ofbail.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for therespondent-State opposed the application.
The earlier bail application filed by the petitioner came to bedismissed reserving liberty to him to renew his request for grant of bailafter completion of investigation. As on this day investigation is notcompleted and therefore the petitioner does not deserve for grant ofbail.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
28[th] December, 2012smr/gkv
_________________________
B.Seshasayana Reddy, J