Telangana High Court
WP/26521/2006 of Konjeti Venkata Koteswara Rao, Vs The Stae SHO, Muppalla PS, Muppalla, on 22 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No.26521 of 2006 22-12-2006 Between:- Konjeti Venkata Koteswara Rao Petitioner And The State SHO, Muppalla P.S., Muppalla, Guntur district and another. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 26521 of 2006 Oral order: In view of the
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
W.P.No.26521 of 2006
--22122006
Between:-
Konjeti Venkata Koteswara Rao
Petitioner
And
The State SHO, Muppalla P.S., Muppalla, Guntur districtand another.
Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMW.P.No. 26521 of 2006Oral order:
In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in.Harisingh v. State of U.P[1], the grievance of thepetitioner that the respondents, in particular the firstrespondent, is not registering the complaint of thepetitioner dated 02-12-2006 which conveys information asto the commission of cognizable offence, may be pursuedby way of appropriate remedy available under Section190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
In view of the availability of a statutory remedy, noorders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Thewrit petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner topursue the available statutory remedies. No costs.
____________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
Dated:22-12-2006Pvks/*
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 2006 (5) Supreme 513.