Telangana High Court
WP/29081/2019 of Makkalla Seetharamulu Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others on 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.29081 of 2019 O R D E R: The present writ petition is filed questioning action of the 2nd respondent in not disposing of the interlocutory application filed in an unnumbered appeal of the year 2017, seeking to set aside the Panchanama dated
WRI T PETI TI ON No.29081 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
The present writ petition is filed questioning action of the 2[nd] respondent in not disposing of the interlocutory application filed in an unnumbered appeal of the year 2017, seeking to set aside the Panchanama dated 05.07.2012 in LTR Case No.197/07/CHG.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that, the petitioner filed an appeal along with an application for stay before the 2[nd] respondent against the order, dated 29.06.2011, passed by the 3[rd] respondent, in LTR Case No.197/07/CGH. Since the 2[nd] respondent was not passing orders either in the appeal or in the stay application, the petitioner, on an earlier occasion, approached this Court by way of W.P.No.26550 of 2018, and by its order, dated 30.07.2018, this Court directed the 1[st] respondent therein, who is the 2[nd] respondent in the present writ petition, to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner in accordance with law and further directed the parties to maintain status quo, over the subject property, till disposal of such appeal.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject appeal is pending on the file of the 2[nd] respondent since 30.01.2017 and despite this Court directing the appellate authority to dispose of the said appeal, no steps have been taken in that regard.
5. In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and since the pendency of the appeal is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare, this Court is of the view that a direction needs to be given to the 2[nd] respondent to dispose of the appeal itself within a time frame.
6. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2[nd] respondent to dispose of the appeal itself filed by the petitioner against the order dated 29.06.2011 passed in LTR Case No.197/07/CHG as expeditiously as possible, and in any event, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.
_____________________
JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR Date:31.12.2019 GJ