Telangana High Court
CRLP/13521/2010 of Syed Abdul Aleem, Vs Smt. Mahmooda Begum, on 30 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.13521 OF 2010 ORDER: 1 First respondent by name Smt. Mahmooda Begum filed a private complaint before the learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners and the same was referred to the Station
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADACRIMINAL PETITION NO.13521 OF 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1 First respondent by name Smt. Mahmooda Begum filed a privatecomplaint before the learned XIII Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners and the same was referredto the Station House Officer, P.S. Moghalpura Hyderabad as provided forunder section 156(3) Cr.P.C for investigation and the same wasregistered as a case in Cr.No.148 of 2009 for the offences punishableunder sections 498-A of IPC and under sections 4 & 6 of DowryProhibition Act against the petitioners herein and after investigation acharge sheet was filed and the same was numbered as C.C.No.550 of2010 on the file of the Court of the XIII Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad.
2 During the pendency of the said proceedings, it appears, therewas a settlement between the parties at the intervention of the elders andin the light of the said settlement, the marriage between the spouses wasdissolved and the wife i.e. first respondent herein agreed for quashing ofthe said proceedings.
3 Today parties are present. When questioned the de factocomplainant by name Smt. Mahmooda Begum stated that the marriagebetween her and her husband was dissolved and that she is notinterested in getting the matter prosecuted. She further submitted thatshe has no objection if the said proceedings against the petitioners arequashed.
4 In the light of the said submissions made by the de factocomplainant herself that she is not interested in getting the matterprosecuted, this court is of the opinion that the said proceedings pendingagainst the petitioner can be quashed.
5 Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the proceedings in
C.C.No.550 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the XIII Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending against the petitioners arehereby quashed.
-----------------
Sri
T.G.K, J.
30.12.2010Kvsn