Telangana High Court
WP/23580/2021 of Vavilala Srinivasa Reddy Vs The Commissioner on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 23580 OF 2021 Between: Vavilala Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. Linga Reddy, Aged about 44
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 23580 OF 2021
Between:
Vavilala Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. Linga Reddy, Aged about 44 yearc, Bill Collector,Khammam tvlunicipal Corporation, Khammam.Khammam tvlunicipal Corporation, Khammam.
...PETITIONER
AND
The Commissioner, Khammam Municipal Corporation, Khammam.
1.The Commissioner, Khammam Municipal Corporation, Khammam.2.The Regional Director-cum-Appellate Commissioner, of Municipal Administration,Wara ngal.2.The Regional Director-cum-Appellate Commissioner, of Municipal Administration,Wara ngal.
JThe Commissioner, and Director of Municipal Administration, State of Telangana,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
4The State of Telangana, represented by lts Pdncipal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) of Telangana, E
R5 is suo motu impleaded as per C.O d|.2410912021
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the Proc.Roc.No. C1191512016, dated 2-4-2016 issued by the1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of Articles 14, 16 and21 of the Constitution of lndia besides being contrary to the rules and also law onthe subject and consequently set-aside the said orders and hold that the petitioneris entitled for reinstatement to duty as Bill Collector in Khammam MunicipalCorporation with all consequentral and attendant benefitscircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the Proc.Roc.No. C1191512016, dated 2-4-2016 issued by the1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of Articles 14, 16 and21 of the Constitution of lndia besides being contrary to the rules and also law onthe subject and consequently set-aside the said orders and hold that the petitioneris entitled for reinstatement to duty as Bill Collector in Khammam MunicipalCorporation with all consequentral and attendant benefits lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petltion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the operation of the Proc.Roc.No. C11915/2016, dated 2-4-2016 issued bythe ['1 ]st respondent and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to duty asBill Collector in Khammam Municipal Corporation, pending disposal of the aboveWrit Petition.the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the operation of the Proc.Roc.No. C11915/2016, dated 2-4-2016 issued bythe ['1 ]st respondent and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to duty asBill Collector in Khammam Municipal Corporation, pending disposal of the aboveWrit Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D BALAKISHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No1: SRI N.RAMU, SC FOR MUNCIPALcoRPoRATTONS NTZAMABAD AND KHAMMAM)coRPoRATTONS NTZAMABAD AND KHAMMAM)
Counsel forthe Respondent No 5: SRI T.L.NAYAN KUMAR, SC FOR SPL PUBLICPROSECUTOR ACB TS
Counsel for the Respondents No 2lo 4: GP FOR MUNCIPAL CORPORATION ANDADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON BLE SRI [JUSTICE ][ABHINAND ][KUMAR ][SHAVILI]
W RIT PETITIO N No.23580 of [2][o21]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the rrotter is token up for [heoring, ][both ][the ][leorned]counsel hqd cor [tended thot the ][issue ][roised ][in ][this ][wri'petition ][is]squorely coverei by the order doted [23.07.2021 ][possed ][by ][this]Court in W.P.Nc .l 6775 oI [2021 ][ond ][therefore, ][the ][present ][writ]peiition moy olsc be disposed of following the soid [order.]
ln view of the obove submission, [following ][ihe o'der ][doted]23.07.2021 [possed ]by this Courl [in ][W.P.No.16775 ][ol ][2021 ][ond ][in]lerms thereof, this Writ Petilion is [disposed ][of ][directing ][the]responcJents to r:view lhe suspension [order ][of ][the ][petitioner ][strictly]in lerms of G.().Ms.No.86 doled [08.03.1994 ][0nd ][G.O.Ms.No.526]doted [.l9.08.200 ][i ]ond [poss ]oppropriote [orders in ][occordonce ][with]low, wilhin o rec sonoble [period, preferobly within ]o [period of ][eight]weeks from the [jole ]of receipt of o [copy of ][this ][order. ][I'lo ][order ][os]lo costs.
Pending n riscelloneous [petitions, ]if ony, [sholl ][stond closed.]
S;D/. T.SRINIVASASSII;TANT REGISTR//TRUE COPY//SECTIONFFICER
To,
1. The Commissio rer, Khammam Municipal Corporation, Khantmam.2. The Regional D [-ector-cum-Appellate ]Commissioner, of [Municipal Administration,]Warangal.2. The Regional D [-ector-cum-Appellate ]Commissioner, of [Municipal Administration,]Warangal.3. The Commissio rer, and Director of Municipal Administration, State [of ][Telangana,]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
4. The Principal Sr cretary, State of Telangana, Municipal Adm nist"ation and UrbanDepartment, Se ;retariat, Hyderabad.Department, Se ;retariat, Hyderabad.5. The Anti Corrup ion Bureau (ACB) of Telangana
6. One CC to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate One CC to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate CC to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate [OPUC]
6. One CC to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate One CC to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate CC to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate to Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate Sri. ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate ) BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate BALA KISHAN RAO ,Advocate [OPUC]7. One CC to STi. [- ]L NAYAN KUMAR (SC SPL PP ACB TS) IOPLIC]7. One CC to STi. [- ]L NAYAN KUMAR (SC SPL PP ACB TS) IOPLIC]
STi. IOPLIC]B. One CC to Sri. I RAMU ,SC IOPUC]9. Two CCs to GP br Muncipal Administration and Urbun Development, High Courtfor the state of 1 elangana (OUT)9. Two CCs to GP br Muncipal Administration and Urbun Development, High Courtfor the state of 1 elangana (OUT)'10. Two CD Copies
11. One Spare Cop' .
rsn ..\!
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212021
ORDER
WP.No.23580 tfi 2021
DISPOSING OI: THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COI iTS
V
\D
6;;;>11lAl'l20??