CIVIL APPEAL 782 of 2013 on 9 December 2013

April 27, 2022Sl. No. 44Court No.34s.biswas IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACriminal Revisional Jurisdiction CRR 52 of 2016

In re. An application under Section 401 read withSection 482 of the Cr.P.C.

In the matter of: Monirul Islam

… petitioner

The subject-matter of challenge in the presentrevisional application relates to the judgment and order dated14[th] August, 2015 passed by the learned Judge (Special) 2[nd]Court, Malda, in connection with P.O.C.S.O. No.133 of 2015arising out of Ratua Police Station Case No.782 of 2013 dated09.12.2013 under Sections 506/417/376(2)(i) of the IndianPenal Code read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

Having regard to the prayers so advanced before thisCourt in respect of warrant of arrest issued, I am of theopinion that more than 7 years have passed and there ischanged circumstances which do not call for interference.

As none appeared on behalf of the State, Mr. ArijitGanguly along with his junior Ms. Manisha Sharma whoordinarily appear on behalf of the State, is directed to appearin this matter on behalf of the State. Let their appearance beregularised by the concerned authorities.

With the observations made above, no interference iscalled for.

Accordingly, CRR 52 of 2016 is dismissed andconnected application if any is consequently dismissed.

All concerned parties are to act in terms of a copy ofthis order duly downloaded from the official website of thisCourt.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)