Telangana High Court
WP/37683/2021 of Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited Vs Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderguda
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT [HYDERABAD](Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANAND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 37683 OF 2021
Between:
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited,HNo.3-6-3'10, HDFC HouseHyderguda Road Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500029. Repuy itJ AutiorisEo signiiorytt4r.V.Venkatesh, S/o. Late.V. Krishna
..PETITIONERAND
1Aadhar Housrng Finance Ltd., (Earlier known as AADHAR Vysya HousingFinance Ltd) Having its corporate office at 3,Bth A Main Road JVT Toweri,Sampangi Rama Nagar, Bangalore, and its Brach at 4-1-371, ll Floor, KundasEstates, Abids Hyderabad.Finance Ltd) Having its corporate office at 3,Bth A Main Road JVT Toweri,Sampangi Rama Nagar, Bangalore, and its Brach at 4-1-371, ll Floor, KundasEstates, Abids Hyderabad.2M/s Diamond lnfra, A Partnership Firm represented by its Managing PartnerMr.Balaswamy Plot No.681 ,H.N o.16-3-77 , Vasanth N'agar, Kuka"tpa"lly post,Hyderabad.Mr.Balaswamy Plot No.681 ,H.N o.16-3-77 , Vasanth N'agar, Kuka"tpa"lly post,Hyderabad.
3M.Ravinder, S/o IVl.Narasimha Aged 65 years, Occ. Partner M/s Diamond lnfraH.No.8-2-503,Road No.7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.H.No.8-2-503,Road No.7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.4D-rVuy-yuru Malini Lavanya, D/o. V.Rama Rao, Aged 42 years, R/o. FIat No.202(2F2) Second Floor Block No.4, Plot Nos.22 and 23, Diamond Hills ExtensionHydernagar, Kukatpally, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.(2F2) Second Floor Block No.4, Plot Nos.22 and 23, Diamond Hills ExtensionHydernagar, Kukatpally, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased toissue a writ, direction or order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in seeking to take possessionof the Flat No,202 (2F2) in 2nd FIoor, Block No.tV, Ptot No.22 and 23 at Kukatpaily,Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the project named Diamond EstatesBlock-lV (SA Schedule Property) vide Notice of the Advocate commissioner dated18.08.2021 issued pursuant to the order dated 18.08.2021 in crl.M.p.No.191 of 2o2ion the file of the Hon'ble chief Metropolitan trrlagistrate, city criminal courts, RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles14' 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia apart from being violative of section 5gof Transfer of Property Act, 1gg2 and consequenfly set aside the same.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under S €,ction 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in the]affidavit filed in suppo t of [the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][stay ][of ][all]further [proceedings ][p ][trsuant ][to ][the ][Notice ][of ][the ][Advocate commissioner ][dated]18.08,2021 issued [pur;uant ][to the order ][dated ][13.08.2021 in crl.M.P.No.191 ][of ][2021]on the file of the Hon'l [,le ][chief ][Metropolitan Magistrate, ][city ][criminal ][courts, ][Ranga]Reddy District at L.B.lliagar, [Hyderabad issued ][in ][respect ][of ][SA ][schedule ][property,]pending final adjudicat rn of the writ [petition.]
Counsel for the [Petiti( ner: ][SRI ][N.V. ][SUMANTH FOR M/S INDUS ][LAW ][FIRM]Counsel forthe [Respt ][rtdents: ][NONE ][APPEARED]The Court made the [fcllowing: ][ORDER]
HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE UJJAL ][BHUYAN]ANDHONOURABLE [SMT. ][JUSTICE ][P. ][MADHAVI ][DEVI]W.P.No.3768[3 ]0F [2021]
. [frr. ][gon'hle ][Sri ][.lustice ][Uiial ][Bhuyah)]
Heard Mr.N.V' Sumanth, [learned ][counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner']
2. Learned counsel [for ][the ][petitioner ][submits that ][respondent ][No'4]has availed loan [t-rom ][the petitioner ][by ][mortgaging the ][secured ][asset']It may be mentioned [that ][respondent ][Nos.2 ][and ][3 ][had ][availed financial]assistance from [respondent ][No. ][l. ][For ][default ][in ][repayrnent ][of ][the]loan, respondent No. I [has ][initiated ][proceedings against ][respondent]Nos.2 and 3 under the Securitization [and ][Reconstruction ][of ][Financial]Assets and Enlorcement ol [Security ][Interest Act,2002 (briefly, ][the]SARFAESI Act l.rereinafter).
3. Be it stated that [the ][secured ][asset ][was sold ][by ][respondent ][Nos'2]and 3 to respondent No'4' [Aggrieved ][by ][the ][action ][under ][the]SARFAESI Act, [respondent ][No.4 ][has ][filed ][securitization application]before the Debts Recovery [Tribunal-I, ][Hyderabad ][(Tribunal) ][which]has been numbered as S.A.No.78 [of ][2021. ][In ][S'ANo'78 ][of ][2021,]Tribunal had passed an order [on ][03.09.2021 ][directing ][the parties ][to]nraintain stat s qln. Subsequently, [the ][said order was ][extended]subject to payment ol Rs.10 lakhs by [respondent ][No.4' ][However,]respondent No.4 has stated that she is not [in ][a ][position ][to ][pay]the aloresaid amount. In the above backdrop, [the ][Advocate-]Commissioner has issued notice dated [18.08.2021 ][for ][taking ][over]
physical po: session of the secured asset. Aggrieved, present writpetition has I een filed.
4. After rearing learned counsel for the petitione:, \\,e are of theview that pt t tioner can intervene in S.A.No.78 of 2021 filed byrespondent I o.4 before the Tribunal and present its crrse. lf thepetitioner filt s such interlocutorv application rvithin a period ol twoweeks from today, respondent No.1 shall not take firrther stepspursuant to n >tice of the Advocate-Commissioner dated i 8.08.2021 .till such tir 3 the interlocutory application of tl.rr: petitioner [is]considered b1 the Tribunal. However, if the petitior er :ails to filesuch interlocu ory application, it would be open to resplndent No.1 toproceed in acc crdance with law.
5. Writ pe ir.ion is, accordingly, disposed of.
6. Miscell rreous applications, if any pending, shall :;tand closed 7 . No cost SD/. T.SRINIVASASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]'\../''\../'SECTION [OFFICER]
//TRUE COPY//
To,1.The. Debts [Re ][cvery Tribunal-|, ][Hyderabad ][.]iv. [Sumintn. ][Adv6cate ][toPucl]1.The. Debts [Re ][cvery Tribunal-|, ][Hyderabad ][.]iv. [Sumintn. ][Adv6cate ][toPucl]Z,o;;6ci;s;I Two CD [CoPie]Two CD [CoPie]4.One SPare [Co1 ]YCHR\$x\$x HIGH COURT
DATED:31 l12l2lt21
ORDERW.P.No.37683 c l'2021
DISPOSING [OF THE ][WRIT ][PETITION]WITHOUT [COS] ][S]
6..v'.rbv k\-"
E [STAI]1q.:i [lo ][Jr'll2o22]{\,\.,