Telangana High Court
CRP/3637/2004 of T.Veera Raghavulu Vs T.Uma Maheswari on 31 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE : G. BIKSHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3637 of 2004 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR: PRESENT:THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE : G. BIKSHAPATHYCIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3637 of 2004
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Orderdated 15-03-2002 made in PLC No. 420 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the DistrictLegal Services Authority at Visakhapatnam (Lok Adalat))
Between:
T. Veera Raghavulu
AND
Petitioner
1. T. Uma Maheswari, W/o. T. Veera Raghavulu, R/o. 53-31-1/6,KRM Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.KRM Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
2. Anuradha, D/o. T. Veera Raghavulu, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
Respondents
3. *The Regional Manager, APSRTC, RTC Complex, Dwarakanagar,Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
Proposed Respondent
*Note : As per the Court order dated 30-7-2004 inCMP No. 12798/04 respondent No. 3 is impleaded.
The petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and thememorandum of grounds filed herein and the Order of the High Court dated 30-7-2004 made in CMP No. 12871 of 2004 and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. RaviCheemalapati, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Whereas this Court found there is scope for compromise in this case anddirected the petitioner as well as respondents No. 1 & 2 to be present before thisCourt on 26-11-2004.
Therefore you namely
1.Mr. T. Veera Raghavulu, S/o. late Krishna Murthy, R/o. RM Office,RTC Complex, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam.RTC Complex, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam.
…petitioner
2. T. Uma Maheswari, W/o. T. Veera Raghavulu, R/o. 53-31-1/6, KRM Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
3. Anuradha, D/o. T. Veera Raghavulu, R/o. 53-31-1/6, KRM Colony,Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
..respondents
are hereby directed to present before this Court on 26-11-2004 to which date thecase stands posted.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
To
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1.The District Legal Services Authority at Visakhapatnam (Lok Adalat).2.Mr. T. Veera Raghavulu, S/o. late Krishna Murthy, R/o. RM Office,RTC Complex, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam.2.Mr. T. Veera Raghavulu, S/o. late Krishna Murthy, R/o. RM Office,RTC Complex, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam.
3. T. Uma Maheswari, W/o. T. Veera Raghavulu, R/o. 53-31-1/6, KRM Colony,Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
4. Anuradha, D/o. T. Veera Raghavulu, R/o. 53-31-1/6, KRM Colony,Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. (Addressees 2 to 4 BY Speed PostSeethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. (Addressees 2 to 4 BY Speed Postalongwith a copy of Memorandum of grounds)with a copy of Memorandum of grounds)
5. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, RTC Complex, Dwarakanagar,Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
6. One spare copy.
USR.
HIGH COURT
DATE: 11-11-2004
Note : Post on 26-11-2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DIRECTION.
Drafted By : USRDrafted On : 16-11-2004
HIGH COURT
GBJ
DATE: 11-11-2004
ORDER
C.R.P. No. 3637 OF 2004