Telangana High Court
WP/23316/2004 of Sampalli Vineel Chandra, Vs The Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal Triveni on 22 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23316 of 2004 Between: 1 Sampalli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 23316 of 2004
Between:
1 Sampalli Vineel Chandra, S/o. S. Muralidhar Rao, Minor, Rep by mother, Natural guardian Smt. S. Vidya, W/o. S.
Muralidhar Rao, aged 43 years, Occ : Housewife, R/o. Flat No. 201, Excel Avenue, Plot No. 140, Rajeevnagar Colony, Hyderabad.
2 Sampalli Vishal, S/o. S. Muralidhar Rao, Minor, Rep by mother Natural guardian Smt. S. Vidya, W/o. S.
Muralidhar Rao, aged 43 years, Occ : Housewife, R/o. Flat No. 201, Excel Avenue, Plot No. 140, Rajeevnagar Colony, Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONERS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Triveni Complex, Abids, Hyderabad.
2 S. Muralidhar Rao, S/o. Hanumantha Rao, R/o. Flat No. 201, Excel Avenue, Plot No. 140, Rajeevnagar Colony, Hyderabad.
3 The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Secunderabad Branch, Patny Circle, Secunderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue any writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofCertiorari or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction call for the records anddeclare the impugned order dt. 2-8-2004 passed in R.P.No. 31/2001 in O.A.No.58/1995 on file of the 1st respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal for the reason notimpleading petitioners or effected parties to the impugned order and quash the samein the interest of justice and equity.
For the Petitioners: MR.I.LAXMIKANTHA RAO, Advocate.
For Respondent No.1: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (SC FOR CG)For Respondent No. 3: Smt. P. Laxmi Kumari, Standing Counsel.For Respondent No. 2: ------- The Court at the stage of admission made the following Order:
Sri Prasada Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of SriLaxmikantha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the main case itselfis posted for pronouncement of judgment today and hence he seeks leave of thisCourt to withdraw the writ petition.
The Writ Petition shall accordingly stand dismissed as withdrawn without any orderas to costs.
(B. Sudershan Reddy, J)
22-12-2004
(M. Narayana Reddy, J)
ks
To
1. The Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal,Triveni Complex, Abids, Hyderabad.
2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, SecunderabadBranch, Patny Circle, Secunderabad.
3. Two CD copies.