Telangana High Court
WP/23411/2004 of M/s. Cynosure Tele Systems P. Ltd., Vs I.B. P. Co. Ltd., on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 23411 of 2004 Between: M/s. Cynosure Tele Systems P. Ltd., G-3, Ground Floor, Kochar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 23411 of 2004
Between:
M/s. Cynosure Tele Systems P. Ltd., G-3, Ground Floor, Kochar Apartments, Begumpet, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director- Mr. G.V.
Ramana Reddy, S/o. Ramakrishna Reddy, 35 Years.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 I.B. P. Co. Ltd., 10, Mayor Ramanathan Street, Chetput, Chennai, rep. by its General Manager. Chetput, Chennai, rep. by its General Manager.
2 The Divisional Manager, I.B.P. Co., Ltd., H.No. 9-1-85 & 84, Amarchand Sharma Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toIssue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaringthe action of the second respondent in conducting the interview on 29.11.2004relating to the contract of Maintenance and Handling of IBP Retail Outlet, Begumet,Hyderabad without issuing interview notices to the applicants and without giving areasonable opportunity as unjust, illegal, arbitrary against principles of naturaljustice and set aside the interviews held on 29.11.2004 by the second respondent inof FBP Retail out let Begumpet, Hyderabad and direct the respondents to issuenotices to all applicants and conduct a fair interview and finalise the contract ofMaintenance and Handling of IBP Retail Outlet, Begumpet, Hyderabad and passsuch other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of thecase.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.AMARNATH GOUDCounsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of thesecond respondent in conducting the interview on 29-11-2004 relating to thecontract of Maintenance and Handling of IBP Retail Outlet, Begumpet,Hyderabad without issuing interview notices to the applicants and without givinga reasonable opportunity, as illegal and arbitrary.
Respondents 1 and 2 filed counter affidavit stating that as per the policydecision taken in respect of the company owned and company operated retailoutlet at Begumpet, the interviews and selections for appointment ofMaintenance and Handling contractor shall not be progressed further and it wasdecided that Maintenance and Handling activities shall be managed directly bythe company.
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
_____________
K.C. BHANU ,J
Date : 30-12-2004
To
1 The GeneralManager, I.B. P. Co. Ltd., 10, Mayor Ramanathan Street, Chetput, Chennai, Chetput, Chennai, 2 The Divisional Manager, I.B.P. Co., Ltd., H.No. 9-1-85 & 84, Amarchand Sharma Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad. Amarchand Sharma Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad.
3. 2CD copies