Telangana High Court

CC/43/2017 of Nune Rambabu Vs Gaffarmaya on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 43 OF 2017 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIUBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 43 OF 2017

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act,1971 to punish the respondents herein for wilfully and violating the Orders of theHigh Court dated 09-01-2014 passed in WP.lvlP.No.539 of 2O14 in WP.No.472 of2014.2014.

Between:

1. Nune Rambabu, S/o Veera Raju, Rl/o. Sathyanarayanapuram Village Varnitulandal Nizamabad District.tulandal Nizamabad District.

2. Nune Savithri, Wo Nune Rambabu R/o. Sathyanarayanapuram Village VarniMandal Nizarnabad District.Mandal Nizarnabad District.

...Petitioners

AND

Gaffarmaya, Tahsildar Yedpalli Mandal, Yedpalli, Nizarnabad District

...Respondent

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri K Durga PrasadCounsel for the Respondent: GP for AssignmentThe Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

CONTEMPT CASE No. 43 of 2Ol7

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing,Sri K.Durga [Prasad, learned counsel ][for the ][petitioners ]submitsthat during [the ][pendency of ][this ][Contempt ][Case, ][the ][main Writ]Petition [vide ][W.P.No.472 of 2074 ][was ][dismissed ][on ][15.06.2018.]

2. By virtue of dismissal of the main Writ Petition, nofurther [adjudication ][is ][required]

3. Accordingly, the ConLempt Case is closed Pending miscellar-teous petitions, if any, shallstard closed.stard closed.

SD/- I. NAGA [LAXMI]DEPUTY [REGISTRAR]

vrSECTION [OFFICER]

//TRUE [COPY//]

To,1One [CC ][to Sri K ][Durga ][Prasad' Advocate ][[OPUC] ]l2Two ccs [to ][GP ][for ][Assignt";i"i];; ][c;'''t ][for ][th; ][state ][of ][relangana ][[oUT]]Two [CD CoPies]

o\

SPKMS

I

HIGH COURT

t

t/t

JSR, J

DATED: 2911212023

o[R][ {HE ][-=^ ][y4][ I]F7toortIi/J1 1t4npn?IF{ta^*tAT(lHEffi,-t,,is,&,

ORDER

CC.No.43 of 2017

CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED

I,,tAv

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead