Telangana High Court
CRP/1148/2016 of P. P. AMARNATH Vs M/S. MARGADARSI CHIT FUND PVT.LTD., AND 6 OTHERS on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO:1148 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orders passed in
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO:1148 OF 2016
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orderspassed in E.A.No.541 of 2015 in E.P.No. 329 of 2ot3 in o.s. No.782 of 2010, dated:passed in E.A.No.541 of 2015 in E.P.No. 329 of 2ot3 in o.s. No.782 of 2010, dated:72-77-2075, on the file of the Hon'ble III senior Civil judge, city civil Court atSecunderabad.Secunderabad.
Between:
P ?. Amarnath, S/o. Komaraiah, Aged about:58 years, Occupation: Service, R/o.H.No.Qtr.No.T2-767, Krishna Colony, Near Supei Bazar, Bho'opalpally, Warangal"District, Presently R/o.T2-30-1, Krishna Colon1,, bhupalapally, Wirangai bisr.i.t.
... [pETr ]T I O N E IVPETITI ON E IVD E FEN D EN T
AND
1!1/S- [Margadarsi ][Chit ][Fund ][Pvt.Ltd., ][Regd, ][Office ][at ][5-10_195, ][Fathemaidan]Road, Hyderabad. Rep. by its General Malnager, Recovery Dept. Sri.A.Suryanarayana RajuRoad, Hyderabad. Rep. by its General Malnager, Recovery Dept. Sri.A.Suryanarayana Raju 2l{{l.VTk1!a {g31a,-S1o-. lc-handraiah, [aged ][about ][48 ][years, Occ: ][Service, ][R/o.]H.No. Qtr.No,SD-296, RK 8 Colony, Sriramfur, Adilabad Districtl{{l.VTk1!a {g31a,-S1o-. lc-handraiah, [aged ][about ][48 ][years, Occ: ][Service, ][R/o.]H.No. Qtr.No,SD-296, RK 8 Colony, Sriramfur, Adilabad District 3YfQ 112 Maruthi l"j"i& Nagar, 9/o. [G.Laxmaiah, ]Mandamarri,ldilabad Diitrict.[aged ][about ][58 ][years, ][Occ: ][Service, ][R/o. ][H.No.42_]YfQ 112 Maruthi l"j"i& Nagar, 9/o. [G.Laxmaiah, ]Mandamarri,ldilabad Diitrict.[aged ][about ][58 ][years, ][Occ: ][Service, ][R/o. ][H.No.42_]
4Yl9.nltu [Narasaish, ][S/o. ][Pochaiah, aged ][about ][58 ][years, Occ: ][Service, ][R/o.]H.No. Qtr.No.SA-54, RK 6 Colony, Sriiampur, Adil;bad District.H.No. Qtr.No.SA-54, RK 6 Colony, Sriiampur, Adil;bad District.
i)Yl.l Y._C,5g{ha_Rao,S/o.Prakash [Rao, ][aged ][about ][58 ][years, Occ: ][Service, ][R/o.]H.No.27-767 / 2, Hamaliwadda, Mancheryila, Adilabad-District.H.No.27-767 / 2, Hamaliwadda, Mancheryila, Adilabad-District.
6Yl.J [V-rllyq-Sryar,S/o.Venkataiah, ][aged ][about ][50 ][years, ][Occ: ][Service, ][R/o.]H.No. 12-952, Reddy Colony, Manchelryala, Adilabad District.H.No. 12-952, Reddy Colony, Manchelryala, Adilabad District.
7Yl Y.B N.urgyrl-u [Raju,S/o.Picham ][Raju, aged ][about ][60 ][years, ][Occ: Service,]R/o. Plot No.11, Kamala Nagar Colony, Medipally, GhatkLsar.Manclal. (TheRespondent No2 to 7 arc nof necessary parties to ihis petition)R/o. Plot No.11, Kamala Nagar Colony, Medipally, GhatkLsar.Manclal. (TheRespondent No2 to 7 arc nof necessary parties to ihis petition)
...RESpONDENTS/DEFENDANTS/PETITTONERS
I.A. NO:1 OF 201 6(CRPMP. NO: 1441 OF 2016)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffic-lavit filed in support of the-petition, irre Higt Court may be pleased to stay afurther proceedings in Ep No. 329 of 201.3 in oE No. zg2 of 2010, dated 12_11_2015against this Petitioner/Judgement Debtor/ Defendant No. 6, on the files of theHon'ble III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. B SHANKERCounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p DURGA PRASADCounsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'I LE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHACIVIL REVISION PETITIO N NO.1 i48 0F 2016CIVIL REVISION PETITIO N NO.1 i48 0F 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned c runsel for the petitioner submits that the CivilRevision Petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed.Recording :he said submission, the Civil Revision petition isdismissed as infr :ctuous.
There she ll be no order as .to costs.applications, if a: ry, pending shall stand dismissed.
Miscellaneous-_':u-'\-yt
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMIASSISTANT REGISTRARt\t \""
/rrRUE [coPY//]
ST.CTION OFFICER
To,
1. The III Senior Civi fudge, [City ][Civil ][Court, ][Secunderabad]2. One CC to Sri [B ][S ][ranker ][Advocate ][OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri [P ][D ][trga ][Prasad, Aclvocate ][OPLiCl.1. Tn,o CD Copies
5. One spare coPyCHTR"&--
HIGH COURT
DATED:3ytt2/2tt2L
ORDER
CRP.No.11,48 of.20!6
:,j .:i- il- att<^(1,. 1. . ':)\)
CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISMISSED ASINFRUCTUOU S
a4/,iL