Telangana High Court
WP/27832/2005 of Kanukunta Ambedkar Nagar, Vs The District Collector on 30 December 2005
MR. JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2005 W.P.No. 27832 of 2005 Between:- Kanukunta Ambedkar Nagar, Sankeshama Sangam (Regd. No. 347/05), Kanukunta, Ramachandrapuram (M), Medak districdt, rep., by S. Srinivas Rao, general Secretary and Social worker. --Petitioner And
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2005
W.P.No. 27832 of 2005
Between:-
Kanukunta Ambedkar Nagar, Sankeshama Sangam (Regd. No. 347/05),Kanukunta, Ramachandrapuram (M), Medak districdt, rep., by S. Srinivas Rao,general Secretary and Social worker.
--Petitioner
And
The District Collector, Medak at Sangareddy and three others.
--Respondents
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO
W.P.No. 27832 of 2005
:O R D E R:
Kanukunta Ambedkar Sankshema Sangam, Kanukunta, a registered society, seeksa writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 not to handover the land ad-measuring Ac. 01-02 gts., in survey No. 213/2 and 214 /2 situated at Kanukunta tothe fourth respondent. It is their case that the land in the said survey numbers is‘shikam land’ and the same has not been so far converted into Ayon (assessedwaste) and, therefore, the same cannot be assigned to anybody. They also furtheralleged that the government of Andhra Pradesh is likely to issue a notification toacquire the land in question for the purpose of widening the road in order to help thefourth respondent to claim compensation illegally.
Page 1 of 2
At the stage of admission itself, after obtaining instructions, learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Revenue (General) submits that the land was alreadyassigned in 1965 in favour of the fourth respondent mistakenly and that necessarysteps are being initiated to resume the land to the government after following dueprocess of law. In view of this, the writ petition must have been filed on a factualfoundation, which is not sound. The land was already assigned to the fourthrespondent and when the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are about to take steps to resumethe land, the present writ petition is filed.
Accordingly, the writ petition, recording the submission of the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader, is dismissed. No costs.
____________
pvks/*
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…